From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David Haufe" <dhaufe@simplextrading.com>,
"Cao Ruichuang" <create0818@163.com>,
"Furkan Çalışkan" <frn1furkan10@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/deadline: Make dl-server nohz full aware
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 13:13:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agRc7bDnav7tgcJT@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513-upstream-fix-dlserver-nohzfull-b4-v2-1-d3e9cbe5c845@redhat.com>
Hi Juri,
On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 11:13:03AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> The dl_server_timer() originally caused spurious IPIs on nohz_full
> cores, breaking isolation guarantees. While such IPIs cannot be observed
> on recent kernels, dl-server timers for tick-stopped isolated CPUs still
> fire unnecessarily on housekeeping cores.
>
> The problem is that dl-servers are not coordinated with nohz_full tick
> state. Even when the tick stops on an isolated CPU, its dl-server timer
> continues to fire on housekeeping, wasting cycles and potentially
> affecting housekeeping CPU performance.
>
> Fix by managing servers in sched_can_stop_tick():
>
> - When RT tasks run with CFS/SCX tasks, start the appropriate server(s)
> and keep the tick running
> - When only RT tasks remain, stop all servers and allow tick to stop
> (except for >1 RR tasks which need the tick for round-robin)
> - When only CFS/SCX tasks remain, stop all servers before stopping tick
>
> Introduce dl_servers_stop_all() to reduce duplication and abstract
> server management from core.c. Unify RT handling into one block that
> handles both RR and FIFO cases.
>
> Note on SCX: While SCX is incompatible with isolcpus=domain, it does
> support nohz_full. The ext_server handling in this patch targets
> nohz_full configurations without domain isolation.
>
> Fixes: 557a6bfc662c ("sched/fair: Add trivial fair server")
> Reported-by: David Haufe <dhaufe@simplextrading.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKJHwtOw_G67edzuHVtL1xC5Vyt6StcZzihtDd0yaKudW=rwVw@mail.gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
From a sched_ext perspective LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
> ---
> Changes from v1 [1]
>
> - Fix CFS/SCX server start logic to handle both simultaneously in
> partial switch mode (Furkan)
> - Clarify in commit message that SCX supports nohz_full despite
> isolcpus=domain incompatibility (Andrea)
>
> 1 - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260512-upstream-fix-dlserver-nohzfull-b4-v1-1-a94844387ae7@redhat.com/
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index b905805bbcbe4..6d05ce9b1dfe6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1414,30 +1414,40 @@ static inline bool __need_bw_check(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>
> bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
> {
> - int fifo_nr_running;
> -
> /* Deadline tasks, even if single, need the tick */
> if (rq->dl.dl_nr_running)
> return false;
>
> /*
> - * If there are more than one RR tasks, we need the tick to affect the
> - * actual RR behaviour.
> + * If there are RT tasks, we may need the tick (for >1 RR tasks),
> + * but we must also service lower-priority CFS/SCX tasks via dl-servers.
> */
> - if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running) {
> - if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running == 1)
> - return true;
> - else
> + if (rq->rt.rt_nr_running) {
> + bool cfs_or_scx_queued = false;
> +
> + if (rq->cfs.h_nr_queued) {
> + dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);
> + cfs_or_scx_queued = true;
> + }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> + if (rq->scx.nr_running) {
> + dl_server_start(&rq->ext_server);
> + cfs_or_scx_queued = true;
> + }
> +#endif
> + if (cfs_or_scx_queued)
> return false;
> - }
>
> - /*
> - * If there's no RR tasks, but FIFO tasks, we can skip the tick, no
> - * forced preemption between FIFO tasks.
> - */
> - fifo_nr_running = rq->rt.rt_nr_running - rq->rt.rr_nr_running;
> - if (fifo_nr_running)
> + /*
> + * Only RT tasks, no CFS/SCX. Stop servers to prevent spurious
> + * wakeups. Tick can stop for single RR or any FIFO, but must
> + * run for multiple RR (round-robin behavior).
> + */
> + dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
> + if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running > 1)
> + return false;
> return true;
> + }
>
> /*
> * If there are no DL,RR/FIFO tasks, there must only be CFS or SCX tasks
> @@ -1462,6 +1472,7 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
> return false;
> }
>
> + dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
> return true;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> @@ -8810,10 +8821,7 @@ int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
> WARN(true, "Dying CPU not properly vacated!");
> dump_rq_tasks(rq, KERN_WARNING);
> }
> - dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> - dl_server_stop(&rq->ext_server);
> -#endif
> + dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
> rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
>
> calc_load_migrate(rq);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index edca7849b165d..c2b3d6bbe4828 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1826,6 +1826,20 @@ void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
> dl_se->dl_server_active = 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Stop all dl-servers on this runqueue. Called when transitioning to a state
> + * where the tick can be stopped (e.g., single RR/FIFO task, or no RT tasks).
> + * This ensures server timers are disarmed and won't cause spurious wakeups on
> + * nohz_full isolated cores.
> + */
> +void dl_servers_stop_all(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> + dl_server_stop(&rq->ext_server);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> void dl_server_init(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq,
> dl_server_pick_f pick_task)
> {
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 9f63b15d309d1..26cf1d14efde5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ extern void dl_server_update_idle(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec)
> extern void dl_server_update(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec);
> extern void dl_server_start(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
> extern void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
> +extern void dl_servers_stop_all(struct rq *rq);
> extern void dl_server_init(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq,
> dl_server_pick_f pick_task);
> extern void sched_init_dl_servers(void);
>
> ---
> base-commit: 4ac4d6549a6563878d7c19c154e017f6cb7114d3
> change-id: 20260513-upstream-fix-dlserver-nohzfull-b4-fa741a2b6189
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 9:13 [PATCH v2] sched/deadline: Make dl-server nohz full aware Juri Lelli
2026-05-13 11:13 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agRc7bDnav7tgcJT@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=create0818@163.com \
--cc=dhaufe@simplextrading.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=frn1furkan10@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox