From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: "kernel test robot" <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Carlier" <devnexen@gmail.com>,
"Allen Pais" <apais@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Axel Rasmussen" <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>,
"Chengming Zhou" <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
"Chen Ridong" <chenridong@huawei.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Hamza Mahfooz" <hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Harry Yoo" <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Imran Khan" <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Kamalesh Babulal" <kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com>,
"Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
"Liam Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"Muchun Song" <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
"Nhat Pham" <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Usama Arif" <usamaarif642@gmail.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Wei Xu" <weixugc@google.com>, "Yosry Ahmed" <yosry@kernel.org>,
"Yuanchu Xie" <yuanchu@google.com>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Usama Arif" <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm] 01b9da291c: stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec 67.7% regression
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 07:27:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agSJ4ulNDZ17ah8H@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agSAT4ldp3dzKWPl@linux.dev>
On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 06:49:45AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:10:34AM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 5/13/26 12:03 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 08:56:52PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > kernel test robot noticed a 67.7% regression of stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec on:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > commit: 01b9da291c4969354807b52956f4aae1f41b4924 ("mm: memcontrol: convert objcg to be per-memcg per-node type")
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > >
> > > This is most probably due to shuffling of struct mem_cgroup and struct
> > > mem_cgroup_per_node members.
> >
> > Another possibility is that after objcg was split into per-node, the
> > slab accounting fast path is still designed assuming only one current
> > objcg per CPU:
> >
> > struct obj_stock_pcp {
> > struct obj_cgroup *cached_objcg;
> > };
> >
> > So it's may cause the following thrashing:
> >
> > CPU stock cached = memcg/node0 objcg
> > free object tagged = memcg/node1 objcg
> > => __refill_obj_stock --> objcg mismatch
> > => drain_obj_stock()
> > => cache switches to node1 objcg
> >
> > next local allocation tagged = node0 objcg
> > => mismatch again
> > => drain_obj_stock()
>
> Actually I think this is the issue, we have ping pong threads running on
> different nodes where though theu are in same cgroup but their current->obcg is
> for local node and thus this ping pong is thrashing the per-cpu objcg stock.
>
> The easier fix would be to compare objcg->memcg instead of just objcg during
> draining and caching. In addition we can add support for multiple objcg per-cpu
> stock caching.
Something like the following:
From d756abe831a905d6fe32bad9a984fc619dafb7e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 07:24:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: skip obj_stock drain when refilled objcg
shares memcg
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index d978e18b9b2d..01ed7a8e18ac 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3318,6 +3318,7 @@ static void __refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
unsigned int nr_bytes,
bool allow_uncharge)
{
+ struct obj_cgroup *cached;
unsigned int nr_pages = 0;
if (!stock) {
@@ -3327,7 +3328,18 @@ static void __refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
goto out;
}
- if (READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) != objcg) { /* reset if necessary */
+ cached = READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg);
+ if (cached != objcg &&
+ (!cached || obj_cgroup_memcg(cached) != obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg))) {
drain_obj_stock(stock);
obj_cgroup_get(objcg);
stock->nr_bytes = atomic_read(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes)
--
2.53.0-Meta
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 12:56 [linus:master] [mm] 01b9da291c: stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec 67.7% regression kernel test robot
2026-05-12 16:03 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-13 2:10 ` Qi Zheng
2026-05-13 13:49 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-13 14:27 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agSJ4ulNDZ17ah8H@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apais@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--cc=kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yosry@kernel.org \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox