From: Samuele Mariotti <smariotti@disroot.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
void@manifault.com, changwoo@igalia.com,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix spurious WARN on stale ops_state in ops_dequeue()
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 11:13:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agV8-RlKEkiAbd-h@cachyos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agTYojgRwDH67QMC@slm.duckdns.org>
Hi Tejun,
>Let's not do the WARN and exit. We shouldn't get this wrong and if we get
>this wrong, it's going to be obvious from lockup detectors. Can you please
>add a comment explaining the retry condition tho?
>
>Thanks.
>
>--
>tejun
Thanks for the feedback. If I understood correctly, you prefer no retry
limit, letting the lockup detectors catch any real bug. I also added
unlikely() since the stale case is by definition rare.
Here is the updated version:
/*
* If SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY is not set, opss is stale: finish_dispatch()
* has already claimed the task and cleared SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY. Retry
* to get a fresh view of p->scx.ops_state.
*/
if (unlikely(!(READ_ONCE(p->scx.flags) & SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY))) {
cpu_relax();
goto retry;
}
Let me know if this looks good to you.
Thanks,
Samuele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 9:53 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix spurious WARN on stale ops_state in ops_dequeue() Samuele Mariotti
2026-05-13 14:26 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-13 16:41 ` Samuele Mariotti
2026-05-13 16:49 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-13 20:01 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-14 9:13 ` Samuele Mariotti [this message]
2026-05-14 20:08 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agV8-RlKEkiAbd-h@cachyos \
--to=smariotti@disroot.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox