The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuele Mariotti <smariotti@disroot.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
	void@manifault.com,  changwoo@igalia.com,
	sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix spurious WARN on stale ops_state in ops_dequeue()
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 11:13:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agV8-RlKEkiAbd-h@cachyos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agTYojgRwDH67QMC@slm.duckdns.org>

Hi Tejun,

>Let's not do the WARN and exit. We shouldn't get this wrong and if we get
>this wrong, it's going to be obvious from lockup detectors. Can you please
>add a comment explaining the retry condition tho?
>
>Thanks.
>
>-- 
>tejun

Thanks for the feedback. If I understood correctly, you prefer no retry
limit, letting the lockup detectors catch any real bug. I also added
unlikely() since the stale case is by definition rare.

Here is the updated version:

/*
  * If SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY is not set, opss is stale: finish_dispatch()
  * has already claimed the task and cleared SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY. Retry
  * to get a fresh view of p->scx.ops_state.
  */
if (unlikely(!(READ_ONCE(p->scx.flags) & SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY))) {
     cpu_relax();
     goto retry;
}

Let me know if this looks good to you.

Thanks,
Samuele

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-14  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13  9:53 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix spurious WARN on stale ops_state in ops_dequeue() Samuele Mariotti
2026-05-13 14:26 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-13 16:41   ` Samuele Mariotti
2026-05-13 16:49     ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-13 20:01     ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-14  9:13       ` Samuele Mariotti [this message]
2026-05-14 20:08         ` Andrea Righi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agV8-RlKEkiAbd-h@cachyos \
    --to=smariotti@disroot.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox