From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f201.google.com (mail-pf1-f201.google.com [209.85.210.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52F3F32F742 for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 23:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779146870; cv=none; b=dKFOUtk3J6f+O0SwV8N9YREzN1EnrIC+A3gbPLRDhDnl0bQZwD4En73QBIlnGgB+Zc3VijO36+KRzUNaN8bKYy2lVa0MmxNltrGL8gtL0cQS21pPr3ogGA86GyxtaERc75plDBogEQW4ygptcNX2+uwHnWBO/p1Z6WBcqYizIxo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779146870; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LveWEQjaE69imEDVnKHgoFrnNq3PUs1D6OYrC+OM+Q0=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=JkUqN8uzQvmDhlaiPAh1yoqARikKGnqHYKS2iGV8pFYfwlg2s+PWOqwBH0SODa/JIayEx00oXIapyAoYIXYfpsXo7t5hUUA/b7VFEAQA9fJptNtKRl6f+4waE4GdMxEWUTnzusVO+IuO4pimVr50hWsbbH1b7abGDOqmTGLU1ko= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=sFcVwE4z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="sFcVwE4z" Received: by mail-pf1-f201.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-82f6b984b3aso1476686b3a.3 for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 16:27:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1779146869; x=1779751669; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+Y+xPAwIC8eSb48BdESvpMKCt3vsSSWOJ9eLuR912qI=; b=sFcVwE4zcje5T8O3Zp3PlTO2p0Byxojnj3wg/g3/556jNuDCyqpBLvbdAakmKIpyLc 2LBxxvPCFUQdukMUkG5S9WSTRVMCHlH6HmO4AE2MsgB91zgKNvWpUr6VE4YfRGvjwfq6 8P6IE4ik92wSYN8NkvMnR8zn7PdlD3qiRZi5pF2f3Je3GB80Vj4+sCGWMxG2gm7tTnNO kdMPOTwACbkLR5UmrkdZeW79LwLJfMqhG4urcnQ8q7w86J+crDQTuGB2A+cSY4BczoVt qm4/IOihzWPSphCISy8KevNwCH1g2AG7cOTVAothhzC87smE84up9diA7kw4bJ3OzhE2 6bwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1779146869; x=1779751669; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+Y+xPAwIC8eSb48BdESvpMKCt3vsSSWOJ9eLuR912qI=; b=h30MA6QwSTHdzNYNA4rxSqiKPTzzH5YPawaQ/7n12FARFXRYw6g4WXV1r8vSZEnFl1 zzaX2D9rkwF02U8Ln52IdkIT+37Rfy0L65LmNHtbJx9snrnJ59w6d/UBqARxB63OmhSU hYyf61LmF++DNb8JXJ7Mb/R/gYJLiHDyaBESmhYjgQxtTXypL1/NGx9GiyMWafh3aE9z rNurQekNz/PUnaJ/+S1Rh8C44ydxjCEh2GECC+skkpPsKhlQypfSoqYzRmx9NU4Jo26w su86Dm3DsSeF/lymkruIwyfaaijkXlR6UrrUlIiELo3w4uq6j6lpYFwKIyhfGkQlhm40 KdaQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ961I4RXAjLe9z/s5eWUqTewb3W9wfQA3w/n++CldvR6xtNTCOoU2eoX1eST41wp+HN6GOi8mn8eD0S3+E=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yztbcs4m2BuOV+D78Rv9utPA4Dd64Bxv1EwAyOywz2iGajoLNY7 SvAprhoFF1qz0s0UbGEW8Zg2y8ErMXKJAy76DsoaiVXucPIGqEJlvKbKxGnEMvyHnTokjzorpQL wTiH35g== X-Received: from pfbg13.prod.google.com ([2002:a05:6a00:ae0d:b0:838:f05:69ac]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6a00:12cf:b0:83c:928:6e5a with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-83f33c8794dmr16843008b3a.13.1779146868490; Mon, 18 May 2026 16:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 16:27:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: Message-ID: Subject: Re: sashiko-bot@kernel.org's Cc list on reviews From: Sean Christopherson To: Roman Gushchin Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 18, 2026, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2026, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 2:08=E2=80=AFPM Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > > > Hey Roman! > > > > > > Sashiko's choice of Cc is... odd. The original mail has a whole pile= of folks > > > in both the To: and Cc:, but sashiko-bot is only replying to myself a= nd (very > > > bizarrely) linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org. > > > > > > Oooh, is it perhaps because linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org is the only = mailing > > > list on the original Cc that has opted-in to getting emails? If that= 's the case, > > > we might want to change that, even though it could result in people g= etting grumpy > > > about unwanted bot mail, because IMO the alternative is worse. I've = been responding > > > to some (mostly very good!) good sashiko-bot feedback, but only just = now noticed > > > that the vast majority of folks on the To/Cc of the original patch wo= n't see the > > > reviews. That's bound to cause confusion, e.g. if someone reports th= e same issues > > > and/or manually looks at sashiko.dev. > >=20 > > Hi Sean! > >=20 > > It's expected per configuration here: > > https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/main/sashiko.dev/email_poli= cy.toml#L138 > > . > > It can be configured to reply to all as well, but since there are some > > very vocal anti-AI folks in the community, this might create some > > friction.=20 >=20 > Heh, "might". >=20 > > In any case, I'm relying on the corresponding maintainers' decision on = how > > they want to configure Sashiko. >=20 > What level of configurability does the parser have? Specifically, can it= key off > the Cc/To in addition to the list? I ask because I really, really, want = to enable > auto-mailing for at least KVM x86, but kvm@vger.kernel.org is wildly over= loaded. > I could try and drive consensus across all 30+ maintainers, but if there'= s a way > to precisely enable it for just KVM x86... >=20 > E.g. is there a way to do something like: >=20 > [subsystems.kvm_x86] > lists =3D ["kvm@vger.kernel.org" && ] > reply_all =3D true Actually, shouldn't this be a line item in MAINTAINERS? E.g. an "A:" secti= on to describe the subsystem's preferences for AI reviews (and in the future, = other things?).