From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E9413DDDAB for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 17:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780335515; cv=none; b=c7OwLryVB1QYQ4KCTYfY8lW5MIksTtf5xBt58lnc4dY7UNI6VndtABcPUUdiSLq5FMxyinuVGHE6fWqnv1xsa0MIV0ZPu3EQu3jFJ3wrmTAVvuAozd+fdFxqapuk6P2ma4VmyIhSmMET310WEOWKimTpoYNWHgFxeUefi5D//S8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780335515; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N6CMPDopGw8PlW2WZTM+uwA3u3KzZhbF2IGuATF0CWc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cPHr+kYL4pOAvXlNP0onyrYKV81TrS8naqLWESOcHnQEqa27g+X6TNSRUwrsmZCAh/mFsnpS67m+6I0N26gp0SA3/Us7OEvxeuQcVhHqJF0L2TeKgnAF1X8bK0RpkZY18kQyQl1MeAOw6ZUJFBhS5CTJ45w5lIipw9+YhLOjO3Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=W4Mqebtv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="W4Mqebtv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB5991F00893; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 17:38:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780335514; bh=hOASESyss7NgMI/zX0vlLVJL0LBedg9zIkeUgLKCbrU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=W4MqebtvxmKLj8Y1Cs6cPANFMjbBQPaS5C24+ZR2tzxBk1wULWL6A1JSlt2A5GOeE 3FGIbJlMoWQUrSKRbaZHm1AsOVQ78FlgclfRvyKwkM6EpZimZTk2M3qEcRJAgRYAmM SHGbpbX+lof+Vo3OrfTk4dSjGVX35VmaFrVl7L6ANTUNZE2fdftqVBi8MUONEAtyEs 12KjDz71/OFDR6rVUZxrrQnMq+qPRqXkVYd2Jr/o+d/1aIG4jXQWxl8iJLRIXVqX4l CaT6bHwJkBjN4zZDibz9V3BpSaj3a1wFpI1ubKvTLXMjBTtBTeyLdj5sw2KwQ1fOa5 +1il0JNLu6q3g== Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 18:38:30 +0100 From: Lorenzo Stoakes To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport , David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] userfaultfd/pagemap: pre-existing fixes Message-ID: References: <20260529172331.356655-1-kas@kernel.org> <20260529173448.40a37785ecbecb6868fdd6a2@linux-foundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260529173448.40a37785ecbecb6868fdd6a2@linux-foundation.org> On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 05:34:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 29 May 2026 18:23:24 +0100 "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" wrote: > > > These are pre-existing bug fixes that were carried at the front of the > > userfaultfd RWP working-set-tracking series up to v5 [1]. Per review > > feedback that fixes should not sit in the middle of a feature series, > > they are split out and sent on their own; the RWP series is reposted > > rebased on top of this. > > > > All six were flagged by the Sashiko AI review of the RWP series and > > carry Reported-by: Sashiko AI review . They are > > independent of RWP, apply to mm-new directly, and carry Cc: stable@. > > And... this made Sashiko point at other stuff: > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260529172331.356655-1-kas@kernel.org > > I can't figure out why four of the scans failed - "View Raw Log" comes up empty. > > It's concerning how frequently Sashiko is finding pre-existing things. What > would a full scan of mm/ tell us? Gulp. > Yeah, but I also kinda wish it didn't do this :) It's similar to sending a series, and somebody replying saying 'well this is totally unrelated but ' and expecting a reply :>) You'd want that person to just submit a patch for the issue or a [DISCUSSION] or [BUG] thread or something, but interrupting, possibly delaying + taking people's (usually very limited) time on something unrelated is just unhelpful I think. I'd prefer Sashiko had a passive mode that checked for existing stuff elsewhere, and it saved the tokens doing it for a new series :) Just my 2 pence! Cheers, Lorenzo