From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Cheng <chengkev@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: x86: Tell ->inject_page_fault() whether or a fault came from hardware
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 11:48:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahXrDZaVL4fKciUQ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO9r8zMVVd6LgBRujJZs9mjWp6Fy4SFxbrGUBNBMsSRFw7krsg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 26, 2026, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 4:27 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > When injecting a page fault (including nested TDP faults into L1), tell the
> > injection routine whether or not the fault originated in hardware, i.e. if
> > KVM is effectively forwarding a fault it intercept. For nested TDP fault
> > injection, KVM needs to grab PAGE_WALK vs. GUEST_FINAL information from the
> > VMCB/VMCS, _if_ the fault originated in hardware.
> >
> > No functional change intended (nothing uses the new param, yet...).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 3 ++-
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 3 ++-
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> > 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 271bdd109a98..d11063c36f03 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -484,7 +484,8 @@ struct kvm_mmu {
> > u64 (*get_pdptr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int index);
> > int (*page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault);
> > void (*inject_page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - struct x86_exception *fault);
> > + struct x86_exception *fault,
> > + bool from_hardware);
>
> Probably a bit late to ask this question, but why do we need
> from_hardware (or the previous hardware_nested_page_fault) as opposed
> to just checking exit_code / exit_reason? Is it possible to get an
> NPF/EPT violation but then synthesize a different one into L1 rather
> than forwarding the one we got from HW?
Yes. E.g. if access to emulated MMIO from L2 hit a !PRESENT fault (EPT Violation
or #NPF), e.g. because MMIO caching is disabled or it's the first time the GPA has
been accessed by L2, then KVM will enter the emulator. If emulating the MMIO
access then hits a TDP fault, e.g. because L2 was accessing MMIO with a MOVQ
(memory-to-memory move), or because L1 has since unmapped the code stream, then
the TDP fault synthesized to L1 will not be the "same" fault the triggered the
VM-Exit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 23:26 [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: X86: Fix nested TDP error code info Sean Christopherson
2026-05-22 23:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] KVM: x86: Widen x86_exception's error_code to 64 bits Sean Christopherson
2026-05-22 23:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: x86: Tell ->inject_page_fault() whether or a fault came from hardware Sean Christopherson
2026-05-26 18:18 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-05-26 18:48 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-05-26 18:52 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-05-27 18:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-22 23:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: SVM: Fix nested NPF injection of PFERR_GUEST_{PAGE,FINAL}_MASK bits Sean Christopherson
2026-05-26 18:31 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-05-26 18:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-26 18:50 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-05-27 18:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-22 23:27 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] KVM: VMX: Synthesize nested EPT violation GVA_IS_VALID/GVA_TRANSLATED bits Sean Christopherson
2026-05-22 23:27 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: selftests: Add nested page fault injection test Sean Christopherson
2026-05-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: X86: Fix nested TDP error code info Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahXrDZaVL4fKciUQ@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=chengkev@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=yosry@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox