From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A478391828 for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 06:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779863801; cv=none; b=Ku8tbKqkFqVue5V5wRny1Uwwh2P9SfcsTQFx24Xe9Qk5HAGYzh+K+3qoiyBDqe/sGoBbuf7eg6EG8fAEMt7jMY/74VZM7DVNGoeTe8WHIlb/IsOwOy7GKEXFsBHUVi4Wkk4InriabxSTkTgxBbsNzf0TIg4sRg1hnPnPg196scY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779863801; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gCYw52Ypb7xQX0kO8kViRmw2Z3wdmHts7vjGzI2WQJY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q6f/JrPGasLB3IOXhgaTy9Lv5EgqZekMSbgx6ri/7VISvF5b7ZP3vzVovpbKawEbs+/4rTanYyy6rN5ExkwJR+/FpQxgAWgdcKB05vEUTQTa8dCKokB7sguRC/nT3ePomT2TLgL1QXXslSQ3MDTmgXuV5O07LMtVpiW6UfKkph8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=DHQAcGUB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DHQAcGUB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 781671F000E9; Wed, 27 May 2026 06:36:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779863799; bh=gCYw52Ypb7xQX0kO8kViRmw2Z3wdmHts7vjGzI2WQJY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=DHQAcGUBwgB8r++5b+u8t6he4piY98f2C+ooZ42Cjn5JEMqB2k+s8i6IrfWbn5Kyw i4MUxRdM0GbmXZEnXQDd3+tOlkEJpX6MS0tSn5s1PIcRObBmxvcn+a+7LtDw68KHs/ RWGQJ5gpvar9WX7zYh8ZljpDaHohGZ7687rQ5FkXGe9D4s1ckLwOLip493w31V63AP s0bnjVQXh+exvnZoeKUavREiUlSA9Q2fpX1U/FQ691u8XPxt1B2nHkxHNIIU1C90gS zphholAUmDRbUDo3HB4ekiS0k//8EbY9wuxbfsXIxGi0bd8rK34QMTw3i/L/gS4wZf tamT3UBC7x8Tg== Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 07:36:29 +0100 From: Lorenzo Stoakes To: Jiaqi Yan Cc: "Oscar Salvador (SUSE)" , Vlastimil Babka , nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, william.roche@oracle.com, tony.luck@intel.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, jane.chu@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, osalvador@suse.de, muchun.song@linux.dev, rientjes@google.com, duenwen@google.com, jthoughton@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, boudewijn@delta-utec.com, ziy@nvidia.com, harry.yoo@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, linmiaohe@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, jackmanb@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Only free healthy pages in high-order has_hwpoisoned folio Message-ID: References: <20260202194125.2191216-1-jiaqiyan@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 10:00:06PM -0700, Jiaqi Yan wrote: > Thanks Lorenzo and Oscar. > > On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 10:17 AM Oscar Salvador (SUSE) > wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 05:09:28PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 03:17:57PM -0800, Jiaqi Yan wrote: > > > > Hi Vlastimil, > > > > > > > > Could you and other page_alloc.c reviewers share your thoughts on this > > > > patchset? Thanks! > > > > > > Hi Jiaqi, > > > > > > I guess you are blocked on review here, did you intend to return to this? > > Yes, as long as this patchset is useful to the community. Yes it is, thanks! > > > > > > > I'd suggest attempted a respin to get some movement here as clearly this slipped > > > through the gaps last cycle. > > > > This fell off my radar, I plan to have a look this week/early next week. Thanks Oscar! > > > > > > By "respin" do you mean I should re-work the patches on top of the > latest akpm/mm-stable or linus/master, for whatever the changes in > mm/page_alloc.c and mm/memory-failure.c since Feb? Rebase on to mm-unstable would be easiest, we're late in the cycle now (rc5) so this will probably have to wait for next cycle, but doing this early makes reviewing easier :) You can either do a v4 RESEND or it may be simplier to just send a v5 where the latest version is just the rebase to avoid confusion. > > > -- > > Oscar Salvador > > SUSE Labs Cheers, Lorenzo