From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dy1-f173.google.com (mail-dy1-f173.google.com [74.125.82.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BF03C4B71 for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 21:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779918967; cv=none; b=m5pH/00IeuGlvVFo7qGnyy8/jeJXbiuyHomVPtV7HBouIynwj9htDSF2lt5nxUz0lK3XnfUXQClwXAV97bmH331G9FjSzYZBCASl+w9ohifA8YSseKEt6OUdPRmh0NwIGQT1fy+0/pkx+hG7/rUjHWrHMlhf57wbccmp06ABPJ0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779918967; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cGKtD3QmWzMTCMfMKYNFa7orYz8sE6eXPChDz4N75IY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qSrIUmwTP2vxvC+jzyj6d/9MRM/BxEhLSKWcmK77lrwOdMGumriB8xwvDA4/JvTrzMuYJ3MeUg1L+QnQGUdrpF7FfvRBlDNlNwYbQCus1QXE2dvGRC4CibdmWmpPgdzvUdjFUhcN+oaTaIpDT8b3YojBbYu0HN7SRUSs2wTAcxY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=kDHCWD97; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="kDHCWD97" Received: by mail-dy1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-3045c195251so5779721eec.1 for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 14:56:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1779918965; x=1780523765; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lXg+VJDmtN8gtR2tAPqmElloUoo693bty2sHUHo0J88=; b=kDHCWD97AFaM0TwG/LKKBFvGv8ZfsoJby8ur46cvwPMS2jOwKjW3mit0bDkFamtB/N qTyCVW+41DzBsXjUyRANmyhLGdxJzh2I1Z+MGEFsNw79DKMHsQZVPa1D090SQEXeOgkQ JFisuGkFjYzHcU2wqaVcSyhJG/RoYdNCCZGggvrzSfgXA+OYpJNgGE8Ncwq5pHZlZWff ksCY2j/u9nF3GgXcVFnev8mbCMIjmu8oIJfmy3anyjfqWsbGAkF9oaz4S/aJFLZFwzav +I3cV69WwqlXLqcXRl543IW+3EKnCeU8KQHjblU52eSjjLWcmwawOgHpS63DIM+Qi9Ns iANg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1779918965; x=1780523765; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lXg+VJDmtN8gtR2tAPqmElloUoo693bty2sHUHo0J88=; b=FjhFkVVTgvmtPmrtQaGQmJE/tcIQpiSPSKB8St8SfNfZgptg4lqzYDVcHdRJ/UcSUa oHvTVnmsBXkk1Iczgv105+j7t3iMs8MBkpWreHQI5WBZpSwF63oU3h83zNIqaLQ6xfrE pbEaZwrR5NuF0izXsB6DAQQWUhXSiVquxoXROSaRczDG1tjV86LQLqpwvKGvoXXRxmYJ GUUvlnwjdVJQG+e1jKaXru/nulrn+mA7qjCxTUEbZD42DS27SeIuDYmkofuOFQfm5A5s jY0FwTYogLX0pT6QlJ57+GI98sEilbRdQwX8H7LhRN67c+4VXxhiXVYYbhK1EikT+fjB hWtQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ+Z5D83oLmGkZf5CYUiUczRaUNEAmTlLvLr2NS87qdTNUqF1mGwHtsGtVwRbt4echO+ZJcm3LF4M5Norvs=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywt11mdsD+1tsgiOc/UzQ5o7W7pkWNhu5S2m/u+Qe9y0RbLrPwV kZJw7m9kmP/L/RlnovBidu3qAhD90epwxitGbcugDgHbcpyr8mfSxS9r X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OExpW6+x8L9UFUs5CbPu7tnSklYQpzl2F4Q+pgx0iWNbGIFP8yeKpZBx4usZla H7/Dd2jnod46+M3AMVDOXrXq+ifdGaluxf5LXiq0sM4yRS3yyvOjCuzzQ3RqsGn1EtyIV+Vh74Q Ilbv/alwXmCK7glzLJWFCxaj8zsj5Bq2q2rhlHEraA7gpC+W2/I6Vv78/2AuZnOBc4JMTPZ8qnc KEPt6isF7pcoVQBYaKPsgrQzyQldh8bpWFBmyHFfQBS8QObhYpOywap88nmvEukfYcVrQ38sU/3 ohYHY/SZq48tCoSQOLDVMlnMpGEXssZXW76cJrDb1bSECBliwwQqzPJy70NtheYw8lFor3AcREe TKh2XUtZSocTk7YZlECEXAuXGFmlf4TTnHYR88GTHpjRwQTDrvcRPsAyP3+CbYUUNRezd2XnUEk dJdpEn89EOkqiH1O+tNN8qzHlRMxy8QaaTEZSC7uLxSum305IXx5kEk3g6rp5YM//9MB1MBds0y Mk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:7300:b507:b0:2da:a813:a5fd with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-30449103797mr11617618eec.22.1779918964504; Wed, 27 May 2026 14:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2a00:79e0:2ebe:8:ca8d:7a6a:7fd3:5948]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-3045245f4e5sm14357429eec.28.2026.05.27.14.56.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 May 2026 14:56:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 14:56:00 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: david@ixit.cz Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Matthias Schiffer , Vincent Huang , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Konrad Dybcio Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-oneplus: Update compatible to include model Message-ID: References: <20260523-synaptics-rmi4-dt-v2-0-0645122babdc@ixit.cz> <20260523-synaptics-rmi4-dt-v2-2-0645122babdc@ixit.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260523-synaptics-rmi4-dt-v2-2-0645122babdc@ixit.cz> Hi David, On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 11:45:35AM +0200, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote: > From: David Heidelberg > > We know the driver is reporting s3706b, introduce the compatible so we > can more easily introduce quirks for weird touchscreen replacements in > followup series. > > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio > Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi > index 6b7378cf4d493..148164d456a5a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi > @@ -475,17 +475,17 @@ bq27441_fg: bq27441-battery@55 { > }; > }; > > &i2c12 { > status = "okay"; > clock-frequency = <400000>; > > synaptics-rmi4-i2c@20 { > - compatible = "syna,rmi4-i2c"; > + compatible = "syna,rmi4-s3706b", "syna,rmi4-i2c"; So I believe we established that this device (s3706b) does not in fact implement rmi4 protocol properly. Why do we have "syna,rmi4-i2c" as a fallback? Shouldn't it be just "syna,rmi4-s3706b"? Thanks. -- Dmitry