From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: cid/cmask interface prep
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 08:18:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiEYwXRzuNe_CF5q@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604020032.3536466-1-tj@kernel.org>
Hi Tejun,
On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 04:00:28PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> v2:
> - New patch 2 reorders the BPF-side cmask helpers (cid.bpf.h) and their
> callers to (cid, mask) so the kernel and BPF interfaces match.
> - Bound scx_cmask_for_each_cid() to the active range so a stale word past
> it can't yield a phantom cid (sashiko AI).
> - scx_bpf_kick_cid() returns scx_cid_to_cpu()'s errno instead of -EINVAL
> (Andrea).
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260603172153.3081861-1-tj@kernel.org
>
> Preparatory changes to the cid/cmask interface that landed in for-7.2 this
> cycle - a single-cid helper-argument reorder on the kernel and BPF sides,
> two new helpers, and a kfunc return-type change. Posting ahead of the merge
> window, in particular the scx_bpf_kick_cid() return-type change in patch 4 -
> it changes a kfunc's signature and is cleaner to settle before 7.2 ships.
>
> - Patch 1 reorders the single-cid cmask helpers to (cid, mask), matching the
> kernel's index-first bit and cpumask predicates.
> - Patch 2 reorders the BPF-side counterparts in cid.bpf.h the same way.
> - Patch 3 adds scx_cmask_test() and scx_cmask_for_each_cid().
> - Patch 4 switches scx_bpf_kick_cid() from void to s32 so future cap
> enforcement can surface failures. The cid interface has no external users
> yet, so the ABI change is safe now.
>
> These are extracted from the in-development sub-scheduler series. Nothing
> here depends on the rest of that work.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 2:00 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: cid/cmask interface prep Tejun Heo
2026-06-04 2:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched_ext: Order single-cid cmask helpers as (cid, mask) Tejun Heo
2026-06-04 2:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] tools/sched_ext: " Tejun Heo
2026-06-04 2:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched_ext: Add scx_cmask_test() and scx_cmask_for_each_cid() Tejun Heo
2026-06-04 2:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched_ext: Make scx_bpf_kick_cid() return s32 Tejun Heo
2026-06-04 6:18 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-06-04 8:32 ` [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: cid/cmask interface prep Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiEYwXRzuNe_CF5q@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox