From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
james.clark@linaro.org, sandipan.das@amd.com, leo.yan@arm.com,
thomas.falcon@intel.com, yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf stat: Fix uncore metric scaling across aggregation modes
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 10:49:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiGCTTH1BKTdmlsG@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ahiU5Te_KR7KRI9Z@google.com>
On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 12:17:57PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 01:15:03PM -0700, Chun-Tse Shao wrote:
> > This series fixes a scaling issue for metrics (like lpm_miss_lat) across
> > different runtime aggregation modes.
> >
> > Uncore metrics currently use `source_count` to scale events. However,
> > `source_count` returns the total uncore unit count regardless of the
> > selected aggregation mode. When evaluating metrics in different
> > aggregation mode other than `--per-socket`, this incorrectly divides
> > aggregated uncore events against the total uncore count rather than the
> > uncores belonging to the aggregation, leading to wrong metric results.
> >
> > To fix this, we:
> > 1. Introduce the aggr_nr() keyword to the metric parser, which
> > dynamically resolves to the active units in the current aggregation
> > group (`gr->nr`).
> >
> > 2. Update the python metrics to use `aggr_nr` instead of `source_count`,
> > ensuring correct scaling across all runtime aggregation boundaries.
> >
> > Before the fix (incorrect low latency in global mode):
> > $ perf stat -M lpm_miss_lat --metric-only -a -j -- sleep 1
> > {"ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "122.8", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "114.5"}
> > $ perf stat -M lpm_miss_lat --per-socket --metric-only -a -j -- sleep 1
> > {"socket" : "S0", "ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "232.1", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "278.2"}
> > {"socket" : "S1", "ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "233.9", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "257.5"}
> >
> > After the fix (correct scaled latency in all aggregation modes):
> > $ perf stat -M lpm_miss_lat --metric-only -a -j -- sleep 1
> > {"ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "231.7", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "245.0"}
> > $ perf stat -M lpm_miss_lat --per-socket --metric-only -a -j -- sleep 1
> > {"socket" : "S0", "ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "238.3", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "249.4"}
> > {"socket" : "S1", "ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "259.1", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "253.1"}
> >
> > v3:
> > Fixed based on Sashiko review:
> > - Removed the unnecessary, copied `redefined-builtin` pylint-disable
> > comment from `aggr_nr` definition inside `metric.py`.
> >
> > v2: lore.kernel.org/20260521035941.3860145-1-ctshao@google.com
> > Fixed based on Sashiko review:
> > - Fixed `aggr_nr` setting when an uncore event fails to run
> > (counts.run == 0) to explicitly set it to 0 instead of defaulting to
> > 1.
> > - Accumulated `aggr_nr` when multiple unmerged PMU events are
> > associated with the same metric ID to prevent incorrect scaling
> > across active sockets.
> > - Removed unused `List` import from `typing` in `intel_metrics.py`.
> >
> > v1: lore.kernel.org/20260520180032.3045144-1-ctshao@google.com
> >
> > Chun-Tse Shao (2):
> > perf stat: Add aggr_nr metric parser support
> > perf stat: Use aggr_nr scaling for Intel uncore miss latency metrics
>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, for v7.2.
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 20:15 [PATCH v3 0/2] perf stat: Fix uncore metric scaling across aggregation modes Chun-Tse Shao
2026-05-21 20:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf stat: Add aggr_nr metric parser support Chun-Tse Shao
2026-05-21 20:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf stat: Use aggr_nr scaling for Intel uncore miss latency metrics Chun-Tse Shao
2026-05-27 19:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] perf stat: Fix uncore metric scaling across aggregation modes Chen, Zide
2026-05-28 19:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-06-04 13:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiGCTTH1BKTdmlsG@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ctshao@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox