From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE8223BB9F5 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2026 09:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780912553; cv=none; b=LDXH3fed0hkqH29EGoMA6UNIIES6h+j3kgxBMzEsTTlTEiUpxL6QIgyCo1HGZgAbI8XxpZc0D/fdaeYunk+9ac6gViwpihmtNv7HUA21Fnee46BVB2Srg4F2CRjUjVuVQZI8hrowSsxtosOXu4dx/KC3d3+Dx9Cyz3IH7bSF5pk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780912553; c=relaxed/simple; bh=InX7GkwRnipOBKSw5EFpPLFFT4P7br9pAUHEoJR1gpc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NWJr7OT5/GXwOqYafGeSzq3b+R0EezERPBquigIKT/oV0ojXMKn72yT7DVQHftAaG6mJ7qT+2C9vMJjHD9qfjqj7zdvwM9w7n9ZEKXJ0PIC2Hbw22HBjhG2zHw8+9dz7MI1UOLmmJYd/AyV3xTvPHTQpShXwSo42Fz74WuXxEv0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=COtmprzD; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=452kTf8v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="COtmprzD"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="452kTf8v" Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 11:55:39 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1780912542; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=InX7GkwRnipOBKSw5EFpPLFFT4P7br9pAUHEoJR1gpc=; b=COtmprzDlGly3YxBCBq70mEtTv+a/KxwMsds4WdOi7JLTAzlRiGPX8lQ4D7w8HZa20B5Hm e5ZfRt+0oITOKebKoo9K+fXPgrgJ6JTu3gE29ddKgCNPq0N1CeajqcqQphZjwxJ76S61zs tEo2XHwh1KG7xgDoi3OQtIVbRx7F3Hw0tcB+0s3KaQGTVz9ytlelyyW5eBapDzJo2W8w9S 8EEvLxWOHObFr11EIq+42fJxJBNJjTwlW6AjIAZEp0I5JPsKRFx3AcDxxKbIaeO91FrIIl gEb/WT4F5Fiao/9fWiasCPSLOXsLeM5a8ebW3+MBesSaB/VRW5yc/hCkaF+dOA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1780912542; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=InX7GkwRnipOBKSw5EFpPLFFT4P7br9pAUHEoJR1gpc=; b=452kTf8vG4xDVUAzz0+zxIdl8KLvEsCjk3nezxdVNwzTM2xTIz/VxdknXkkZAGKmlx+5nM loNehD8s+JtgNsBQ== From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: Maciej Wieczor-Retman Cc: Ingo Molnar , Maciej Wieczor-Retman , mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@kernel.org, sohil.mehta@intel.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, john.ogness@linutronix.de, ludloff@gmail.com, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/cpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v3.1 Message-ID: References: <9653d8690ec7093c8190b12d1fa8c689c4da50fe.1780506200.git.m.wieczorretman@pm.me> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, 08 Jun 2026, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote: > > I see the patches were already merged to tip but perhaps in the next release we > could put the character limit information in a comment somewhere in the > tools/arch/x86/kcpuid? > Nah, please, it's not worthwhile. That's the first time we hit the limit, and that's with a CPUID database of 64 leaves and 1104 bitfields. Thanks, Ahmed