From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CF6C344DAE; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 19:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781033598; cv=none; b=F14uEPAxL/csdPNLkaqT5/YXxku8xB6TmsyxaZqbsIorY9/2jOXyZRwcFNAZYK4io0jiWjVQdfP7mgsSubYgijGjq8qW0hUAyx7iKbUDY4JAw5Do22AqZlT+ltNlUxyTvf/QnIzU2gSXMsHuqolEiJnO8AHAaCvbxPMfUCYwzek= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781033598; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4sQeWTpTHfO3TwVdreiqV4yVzlLjiyYiPOU+cAH5/cQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eTg/4SiJHi6jyCc2rm+I+FXYnkLQq68oSNwDTjeTEgrNA4cII/ullzXxoD03wYmNKnuccDARhcWu7dJC8pdjIh36aeNvJZpHsyZgGhLEreTsZurFITxruEMCrYYbothPz1sW4yHzwFivcoDKjucqJ3R4gYvQqIh3MVpAr6PB3rw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lOBzEaF+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lOBzEaF+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1781033597; x=1812569597; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=4sQeWTpTHfO3TwVdreiqV4yVzlLjiyYiPOU+cAH5/cQ=; b=lOBzEaF+H80mVUh5CfS0lZGc2y2VcV6XDGfaiynKziDBXBHrsdP3o+UE QFfATsccrHI7YmPAKNCQe+NLjSQVou+51wJGOE9JxB8MbtjtuM8w155yj Eds7WkyC1dgz3Rkzmn2RaeGaAANH69Pf/+E/42bkygeQ03+62K6yk1kzs WF8EfovCu77965cqWoAmzuNM15X/Yc/eKFQZ6NcVaoaqBv8Biy6S7H1E1 W2vC8cCIxKPtjOryDcijXz1TdEcLwBBNl3xofGLRogNGlLt9wk5GvkKUQ DKh6d8vfY1mZoTZsgpBcLwTkWeRRx8adq1P1Z16XUjKKMPIGCBRuOGyJi A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: y8DJ9cu8S1i5xZGjTKfs5g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: t6LY9rQOSbmJHSOwRqykkw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11812"; a="92130910" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,196,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="92130910" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jun 2026 12:33:16 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: SOLNmU1EQEStSFclzpEaCQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: hgRnIwRJQVqbOU668KynsA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,196,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="242986939" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jun 2026 12:33:13 -0700 Received: by black.igk.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 0F98E95; Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:33:12 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Roman Vivchar Cc: Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Lee Jones , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Ben Grisdale Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] iio: adc: mt6323-auxadc: add mt6323 PMIC AUXADC driver Message-ID: References: <20260609-mt6323-adc-v2-0-aa93a22309f9@protonmail.com> <20260609-mt6323-adc-v2-2-aa93a22309f9@protonmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 07:15:42PM +0000, Roman Vivchar wrote: > On Tuesday, June 9th, 2026 at 9:30 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 04:31:59PM +0300, Roman Vivchar via B4 Relay wrote: ... > > > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: > > > + scoped_guard(mutex, &auxadc->lock) { > > > > I'm wondering why we haven't moved to guard()() here > > The compiler would complain about 'cannot jump from switch statement' > due to default case. I am not sure I follow. See the examples in the existing drivers. They are warning clean in that sense. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko