From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f73.google.com (mail-ed1-f73.google.com [209.85.208.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CA7738759C for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.73 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781075640; cv=none; b=rElt/yji5ufSJZi9jPdsAUbtrtG6GnrXw5m6YIuxTn4jwXFNQt7LitNNFyHZDRotg6SJO64PHNjXkX8YnfF9eHKooXmF0GDIwuMZp0Mht74emm5eRYH0QvWc8xVnaqJY8sTMELHUw2zIYF0EH7yUcM+ogkDiy4704byQnMUGgOo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781075640; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GgADrub1g4FXQiLnn4LEUgo9LFB1ETRDIU9Hd1IlEMc=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=OBAI1PnS0pBRWjHK4wN4sjl99ymLUzool46ZeVseZW08BfXgnuFU4wnYp4SS/mEuBoh9L1+c3SJGtXQN0UP6Gn6SOPtt1FFCJ5ZWbla68GKrx/398VIgVPG6IL/TC2ZFq5/VUuiEHzOTPWewjr130MplrLud0KfM4qvzu++KyW8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--aliceryhl.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=mMOOflH2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.73 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--aliceryhl.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="mMOOflH2" Received: by mail-ed1-f73.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-68c2fe45057so6367926a12.3 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:13:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1781075636; x=1781680436; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GgADrub1g4FXQiLnn4LEUgo9LFB1ETRDIU9Hd1IlEMc=; b=mMOOflH2oMuge/4RKAX3GooQSFbkCNiEXbAUBGSqRR1SfJdsspht2MvyVBVFBufSVU bv5hR5B2MUQGklZHKhG7IAMJduYvejIlB7yKjcp+tf5+esx9Zg8oACwT2vsopPSJIDq2 pT/l1ASoNuLTm/B7E/A0Om6GFrRDcOe2E0H5dQe8EHjZsr+9w41Oy7WyEhYMQhCD69Wi uVxSdAcSCDlJ1Z0Q52BrIqw7TX1BGroJsCtwcrkQR6GsPQSVBVX8lTrWwk/Nhmf/so4Z 5FG7FrVjCXVpkn1bQFNaPMFalFsAXymXNPyW0dx89hR1RHBKeghEVm+PN2HS68miOc86 RxKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1781075636; x=1781680436; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GgADrub1g4FXQiLnn4LEUgo9LFB1ETRDIU9Hd1IlEMc=; b=YEVzhZFu+1cX+V9cGtwmiN2pQFHkLPnt2Eg+aoHndABl/8OlwKHEnyx+95e4ciF9q+ hrolrFoeg8naNRrNdYknsilx34E+iKOySK/394Afm8AGSW44jJtfIlR2u5XJSwcbl6J7 Spqj1rCRl0/eITunmc498AsWBVE0P9Z6kxurcsn1neJtvllOTS5JoNxdacoRNLg3gDdo 7zjg5Q80Wu9HbPpi2e6QjfgwV5cemE4XwgDkjxnHXN3Q91Jq02dCHYkTkjjJY+5bA0fw nhucO2Y8NJD5P9fXK/tep1iNxcADnFa+MxXMNrruuKkPK02NLOfRCw0G19QepOBbG71m X6SA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9q0PRkJWfQHWx115T6bAQO3OPFRXs+Va7gvxpUwFnnt0V5tf2Qt/PhB1JdCokJzx5cbeim/xqe9f/u06Y=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwPA/42+BQ8SVQKNfZyN32Uhcyh52Q/tJ35W68IpNoxB9JpJxRV YL0CaAs1un/u32CgblpY/5cwzI/b5LYpbPfwyQrosnI6rDzU66g4KgvXmGp1a9O1eaRRXVupRBp wIDbuu6Ac2csyucj8/Q== X-Received: from edai32.prod.google.com ([2002:a05:6402:f20:b0:68c:5e5a:6095]) (user=aliceryhl job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6402:518f:b0:691:b5aa:5a7b with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-69238635440mr3224327a12.17.1781075636160; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:13:54 +0000 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20260609003256.1829625-4-samitolvanen@google.com> <20260609003256.1829625-6-samitolvanen@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] rust: drm: gpuvm: require Send and Sync for GpuVm's shared data From: Alice Ryhl To: Sami Tolvanen Cc: Danilo Krummrich , Matthew Brost , "Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Hellstr=C3=B6m?=" , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Miguel Ojeda , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , "=?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJu?= Roy Baron" , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Trevor Gross , Daniel Almeida , Asahi Lina , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 06:54:28PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 5:33=E2=80=AFPM Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > > > GpuVm implements Send and Sync unconditionally, but it shares and drops > > T::VmBoData and T::Object across threads: obtain() can return ARefs to > > the same bo on several threads, and deferred_cleanup() drops them on > > whichever thread calls it. This is unsound unless both are Send + Sync, > > so bound both impls accordingly. >=20 > Sashiko keeps finding more issues here. For the benefit of those not > subscribed to dri-devel: >=20 > > This is a pre-existing issue, but does GpuVm also need Send + Sync boun= ds > > for T::VaData here? > > > > Since GpuVm explicitly bypasses the lack of Send on VaData, > > UniqueRefGpuVm automatically derives Send. This allows safe code to = map > > a VA containing !Send data on one thread, send the UniqueRefGpuVm to > > another thread, and unmap the VA there. > > > > Unmapping via sm_unmap() returns a GpuVaRemoved which drops the !Sen= d > > VaData on the wrong thread, potentially causing data races. >=20 > Looking at the code, UniqueRefGpuVm seems like a better place for this > than GpuVm. However, before I go add another patch to the series, I > wonder if it would make more sense to just add these bounds to the > DriverGpuVm trait instead? I'd be happy to hear some non-AI thoughts > about this too. Adding bounds on the trait does sound like a good idea for simplicity. It's not like we're ever going to use GPUVM with non-thread-safe types. If it's help, note that you can use `where GpuVm: Send` bounds or similar to "reuse" the implementations elsewhere. For example, GpuVmBo being Sync requires GpuVm being Sync because of the GpuVmBo::gpuvm() method, so you can use `where GpuVm: Send` as a bound to directly express that if you want. But if we just add bounds to the trait, it may not be necessary. Alice