From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 02/10] KVM: selftests: Add aligned guest physical page allocator
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:18:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aimOVomL2RzYt2J4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df86b5ccdbdafc3509d9538bd5e6796737bab2db.1781093720.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>
> powerpc will require this to allocate MMU tables in guest memory that
> are larger than guest base page size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> [Rebased to latest mainline tree]
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 20 +++++++++--
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 33 +++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> index 3666a8530f31..c515c918c2c9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> @@ -991,8 +991,8 @@ void kvm_gsi_routing_write(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_irq_routing *routing);
> const char *exit_reason_str(unsigned int exit_reason);
>
> gpa_t vm_phy_page_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, gpa_t min_gpa, u32 memslot);
> -gpa_t __vm_phy_pages_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t num, gpa_t min_gpa,
> - u32 memslot, bool protected);
> +gpa_t __vm_phy_pages_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t num, size_t align,
> + gpa_t min_gpa, u32 memslot, bool protected);
> gpa_t vm_alloc_page_table(struct kvm_vm *vm);
>
> static inline gpa_t vm_phy_pages_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t num,
> @@ -1003,10 +1003,24 @@ static inline gpa_t vm_phy_pages_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t num,
> * protected memory, as the majority of memory for such VMs is
> * protected, i.e. using shared memory is effectively opt-in.
> */
> - return __vm_phy_pages_alloc(vm, num, min_gpa, memslot,
> + return __vm_phy_pages_alloc(vm, num, 1, min_gpa, memslot,
> vm_arch_has_protected_memory(vm));
> }
>
> +static inline gpa_t vm_phy_pages_alloc_align(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t num,
> + size_t align, gpa_t min_gpa,
> + u32 memslot)
Given that the PPC usage is all for naturally aligned allocations, I think it
makes sense for that to be the API, i.e. have "bool naturally_aligned" instead
of an arbitrary alignment.
> +{
> + /*
> + * By default, allocate memory as protected for VMs that support
> + * protected memory, as the majority of memory for such VMs is
> + * protected, i.e. using shared memory is effectively opt-in.
> + */
Duplicating this big comment is very ugly. In general, these APIs could use
some love. E.g. taking in @memslot is essentially a historical wart that isn't
necessary except for literally just memslot_perf_test.c, which allocates memory
in a huge number of memslots.
If we rework the APIs to take the memory region type instead of the memslot, then
we can kill many birds with one stone. It takes quite a bit of cleanup to throw
that one stone, but I think the end result can be quite nice.
Compile tested only at this point, but I now have a series of ~17 patches to yield:
__weak bool kvm_arch_needs_naturally_aligned_page_tables(void)
{
return false;
}
gpa_t __vm_phy_pages_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t nr_pages,
enum kvm_mem_region_type type, bool protected)
{
struct userspace_mem_region *region = vm_get_mem_region(vm, type);
bool naturally_aligned = false;
gpa_t min_gpa;
TEST_ASSERT(region, "No region for type '%u', memslot '%u'",
type, vm->memslots[type]);
switch (type) {
case MEM_REGION_CODE:
case MEM_REGION_DATA:
case MEM_REGION_TEST_DATA:
/*
* If the region is backed by the default memslot (id=0), use
* selftests' hardcoded minimum PFN, otherwise use the base of
* the custom memory slot that backs the region.
*/
if (!vm->memslots[type])
min_gpa = KVM_UTIL_MIN_PFN * vm->page_size;
else
min_gpa = region->region.guest_phys_addr;
break;
case MEM_REGION_PT:
min_gpa = KVM_GUEST_PAGE_TABLE_MIN_PADDR;
naturally_aligned = kvm_arch_needs_naturally_aligned_page_tables();
break;
case MEM_REGION_TEST_EXTRA:
min_gpa = region->region.guest_phys_addr;
break;
default:
TEST_FAIL("Invalid memory region type '%u'", type);
break;
}
return ____vm_phy_pages_alloc(vm, nr_pages, min_gpa, vm->memslots[type],
protected, naturally_aligned);
}
with convenience wrappers:
static inline gpa_t vm_phy_pages_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t nr_pages,
enum kvm_mem_region_type type)
{
/*
* By default, allocate memory as protected for VMs that support
* protected memory, as the majority of memory for such VMs is
* protected, i.e. using shared memory is effectively opt-in.
*/
return __vm_phy_pages_alloc(vm, nr_pages, type,
vm_arch_has_protected_memory(vm));
}
static inline gpa_t vm_phy_page_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm,
enum kvm_mem_region_type type)
{
return vm_phy_pages_alloc(vm, 1, type);
}
static inline gpa_t vm_alloc_page_table_pages(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t nr_pages)
{
return vm_phy_page_alloc(vm, MEM_REGION_PT);
}
static inline gpa_t vm_alloc_page_table(struct kvm_vm *vm)
{
return vm_alloc_page_table_pages(vm, 1);
}
That way we don't need to add yet another rarely used param to the APIs, and
PPC just needs to define kvm_arch_needs_naturally_aligned_page_tables(). The
bonus is that @min_gpa goes away too.
It'll probably take me a few days/weeks, but I'll try get a series posted before
the 7.2 merge window closes, so that you can build on top to get the PPC selftests
support landed in 7.3.
> @@ -2039,23 +2039,22 @@ gpa_t __vm_phy_pages_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t num,
> TEST_ASSERT(!protected || region->protected_phy_pages,
> "Region doesn't support protected memory");
>
> - base = pg = min_gpa >> vm->page_shift;
> - do {
> - for (; pg < base + num; ++pg) {
> - if (!sparsebit_is_set(region->unused_phy_pages, pg)) {
> - base = pg = sparsebit_next_set(region->unused_phy_pages, pg);
> - break;
> + base = min_gpa >> vm->page_shift;
> +again:
> + base = (base + align - 1) & ~(align - 1);
> + for (pg = base; pg < base + num; ++pg) {
> + if (!sparsebit_is_set(region->unused_phy_pages, pg)) {
> + base = sparsebit_next_set(region->unused_phy_pages, pg);
> + if (!base) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "No guest physical page available, "
> + "min_gpa: 0x%lx page_size: 0x%x memslot: %u\n",
> + min_gpa, vm->page_size, memslot);
> + fputs("---- vm dump ----\n", stderr);
> + vm_dump(stderr, vm, 2);
> + abort();
> }
> + goto again;
> }
> - } while (pg && pg != base + num);
> -
> - if (pg == 0) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "No guest physical page available, "
> - "min_gpa: 0x%lx page_size: 0x%x memslot: %u\n",
> - min_gpa, vm->page_size, memslot);
> - fputs("---- vm dump ----\n", stderr);
> - vm_dump(stderr, vm, 2);
> - abort();
> }
This is unnecessary churn. I'm not saying the current code is pretty or anything,
but unless I'm missing something, this can simply be:
@@ -2025,7 +2027,7 @@ gpa_t __vm_phy_pages_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t nr_pages, gpa_t min_gpa,
TEST_ASSERT(!protected || region->protected_phy_pages,
"Region doesn't support protected memory");
- base = pg = min_gpa >> vm->page_shift;
+ base = pg = ALIGN(min_gpa >> vm->page_shift, alignment);
do {
for (; pg < base + nr_pages; ++pg) {
if (!sparsebit_is_set(region->unused_phy_pages, pg)) {
>
> for (pg = base; pg < base + num; ++pg) {
> --
> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 12:47 [PATCH v3 RESEND 00/10] KVM: selftests: add powerpc support Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 01/10] KVM: selftests: Move pgd_created check into virt_pgd_alloc Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 02/10] KVM: selftests: Add aligned guest physical page allocator Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 16:18 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-06-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 03/10] KVM: PPC: selftests: add support for powerpc Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 04/10] KVM: PPC: selftests: powerpc enable kvm_create_max_vcpus test Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 17:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-06-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 05/10] KVM: selftests: Print the vcpu_id when KVM_CREATE_VCPU ioctl fails Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 12:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-06-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 06/10] KVM: PPC: selftests: Use u64 instead of uint64_t Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 07/10] KVM: PPC: selftests: Use s64 instead of int64_t Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 08/10] KVM: PPC: selftests: Use u32 instead of uint32_t Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 09/10] KVM: PPC: selftests: Use u8 instead of uint8_t Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 10/10] KVM: PPC: selftests: Replace u64 gpa, u64 gva|vaddr with gpa_t and gva_t Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-06-10 12:51 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 00/10] KVM: selftests: add powerpc support Sean Christopherson
2026-06-10 12:53 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-06-10 16:19 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aimOVomL2RzYt2J4@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox