From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A5673264E0 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 13:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782393933; cv=none; b=IVmlyXwtve3iwWXtTKMV+fAMzoh/k/oeI3DFmP1NqMmfbesYFTYHZdg1VBdbXO6e0W9pEKvxdd4poEE4COp5awCU4k35f42uZ5Ryho2ekMxr/xzTMa2BNJNJ2KgJ+EW7lmrnyM8gu/8B4BbWCGlyKMlSqgA64Nl8vcjj+GT4eTA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782393933; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CuJ0BugtLYxwc1oJUnknpEje0INE4USJkZ2gvWfu+d0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cSzJE/wckFKPQylyk7JjHEv6KTMAkMVmoeQpPZeY+5AtUr08V8LVT7qPfY8wuBBRWuKlBYaOP95i0Zs6LlfYSy/aJAM0YvLLZMThEs03Zub4NGZLooatv3ilV0gOwNK2FqfrpcbbUO0YFIVw1eOv+tjra8OLweMo5SJ7okD06fg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=dLPEHmTq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=YjwiGejQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dLPEHmTq"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="YjwiGejQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1782393931; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1O7Yij0Kw0ewgtwKjx6DJe41xbKPrRcBzrJalpv0Dok=; b=dLPEHmTqKk6ZFyHriIptldtq8dWAgNx5f+ru+2iPLIQ/HEtARrpVrMDTqcv5I+ddDbZ5fc DZUWPH2YOAKBF6V8hOmTwqr9UdF6cZGwLquCLhMy0aZ1/9vihRG9OCxDQOSafuIlfpLpVj gtwcU4nEB30+vsaoH6NFraThsOIsvzk= Received: from mail-qv1-f70.google.com (mail-qv1-f70.google.com [209.85.219.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-593-e-RnMLjWMbGWll63fKpfCQ-1; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 09:25:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: e-RnMLjWMbGWll63fKpfCQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: e-RnMLjWMbGWll63fKpfCQ_1782393928 Received: by mail-qv1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8e06f4680bbso42703386d6.2 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 06:25:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1782393928; x=1782998728; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=1O7Yij0Kw0ewgtwKjx6DJe41xbKPrRcBzrJalpv0Dok=; b=YjwiGejQC7UPEFYbTu8MLpEUW8Cvvjcc/Hhp41yU+fJCXd6Kg/w40Vjp8lA/vAtasO OdA6JkaC+K80qZHOTuM9BL0t/e1uPg+rAZw6ltoZh1zwtdZagzFXPwwAZFXq5ipxd6la HV90xu+VrT+KsZ/JI1OzV9Csb0OhRBeurSStcq8VSlu0EUVEuW6thT5K49+tEvu2ikTU /ZalshN/jFrIBQrLvuPtNoWwbqSOBVTcnq/N7PpW7PrTb/ew6XPxT+O2maJ02so6QR13 YHxG6J8B8W6phaLAZf5tnlf1vpfYTjhKoclk4Z/LZLpAJPlo45tkqXWGUO/JNzhoUUJ/ nQmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1782393928; x=1782998728; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1O7Yij0Kw0ewgtwKjx6DJe41xbKPrRcBzrJalpv0Dok=; b=BsYzEHeh4q1Wc4eHdN2bzhT2M76Gye4YcfLfxeG7JfvlUwzcNJQa/2Vvwcv5t/DcL1 8apZxm0e73KB2kOSXXr9YJjqDmheApR2ituCmFYyvkF3VsBDYQglHcjkzCuVCKGO4sN+ w5jiUCFQRP5CU9hhoTV6mH5cu/dqtM6hkzn02pc0wKMbYUfLxlVw5fu5eKjKXUDZ0pRD iUREquLlo38KlgJhe5rLjaDASK4Ral2yb7svtCOpSeVnZweLPgg7YClxKoon1wLgwgGZ LHZakGCOExowSpy0jCxL7h+dBpXnNjKV/PaX7kpHMY9c/QlQib5k1rM2YhlpGNK2UeWA FVIw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Rqp7CiGcH2WjHzrmB/s+aKw38unoHYVU+tfSq6R/uxHoJlhXdtKDmg8FawCtOiI98ZkosHanZ1XwOg1NVQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywovo4HQz/9Eai8A1hMYXXLnWg8aMOgyNQhM0XD0Z4IpYcMRICP 2esHN1sv3wLhHrEmSHu97V4YgGKWfks2q2hP/rHoKixz1kEWlMfZVC3M+n2AkTeqvcrGonMny7j +2SUkMwR7WEUPhSN93MmF+kNWxdalSvC94ZxgZZnoota3ZCifq1iLmNGT17IG7ZiUVw== X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7ckQ+0Nrt1HQ5uloUhfUUdc9RxlREY+DkVjIsr47bT8C7zmBkrve+R4opDpWv3v Rn+oCAxcPgPTM3UZKFdIQP+jQ7V0t1wsN6I8BN1WDnSlVnKKaCHZBfHG4GbXZ2WLuqJ38fzRlD0 yBuNepJE5o5mO4n401AfNEAMEfMhZn5jaJILE/HYrfdx9eY9PqUIeNZ/6Red11AAAb0yyvnD41m mCS8OQ0k4OFjKv2KWeuTrpXZYX50w8OY+FeCH3DhWoPq2HmMRMbdvQpVwXdzc6DEkyd814W5rY3 vgU0nIpKnke52GlJoJjVSM+MtSBfYl7cQ/CnXslmYPK0luzbfrLU7hvc9/PKHqAzG6vi/L1aefe 0W3TdYUmW X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2f13:b0:8ce:aace:eaf8 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8e6d658248bmr40429476d6.43.1782393928292; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 06:25:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2f13:b0:8ce:aace:eaf8 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8e6d658248bmr40428846d6.43.1782393927741; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 06:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([162.255.191.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-8df820bfdd0sm180527086d6.35.2026.06.25.06.25.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Jun 2026 06:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 09:25:20 -0400 From: Brian Masney To: Konrad Dybcio Cc: Saravana Kannan , Abel Vesa , Maxime Ripard , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Russell King , Bjorn Andersson , Hans de Goede , Dmitry Baryshkov , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Jens Glathe Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: qcom: common: introduce qcom_cc_sync_state() Message-ID: References: <20260616-clk-sync-state-v2-0-15f82c64d95c@redhat.com> <20260616-clk-sync-state-v2-2-15f82c64d95c@redhat.com> <21bbffb7-ce99-4c38-a5cc-6a3f3c7f48eb@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.3.2 (2026-04-26) On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 02:19:21PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 6/25/26 1:38 PM, Brian Masney wrote: > > My next version of this series that I haven't posted yet allows chaining > > the sync_state callbacks at the driver core level. It doesn't require > > any of the QC clk driver changes, and will allow us to play nicely with > > the pmdomain subsystem, and any others the move to sync_state in the > > future. > > > > I think I see the confusion between us the last few rounds of review. In > > this series, I added qcom_cc_sync_state() and converted 6 drivers over to > > use it. (I excluded clk-cbf-8996.c since it is separate.) Only the 6 > > drivers today that called icc_sync_state() now call qcom_cc_sync_state() -> > > icc_sync_state(). So from my vantage point it is the same overall > > functionality. > > > > I didn't look at this from the perspective of qcom_cc_sync_state() would > > be common infrastructure, and a newly added driver in the future that may > > not interact with the ICC framework may use this. Is this correct? > > Aaah right, my mistake. I assumed that adding that binding > qcom_cc_sync_state to all qcom clock drivers was the next step. OK cool... I'm glad we figured this out. Email can be tough sometime! :) Brian