From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: hexlabsecurity@proton.me
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - bound the F54 report size to the allocated buffer
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 22:19:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aj4LoEHHCMqUnyy2@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260613-b4-disp-6721686c-v1-1-4d5bb84ee520@proton.me>
Hi Bryam,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2026 at 11:01:16PM -0500, Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
>
> rmi_f54_work() reads a diagnostics report from the device into
> f54->report_data, sizing the transfer with rmi_f54_get_report_size():
>
> report_size = rmi_f54_get_report_size(f54);
> ...
> for (i = 0; i < report_size; i += F54_REPORT_DATA_SIZE) {
> int size = min(F54_REPORT_DATA_SIZE, report_size - i);
> ...
> rmi_read_block(.., f54->report_data + i, size);
> }
>
> report_data is allocated once at probe from F54's own electrode counts
> (array3_size(f54->num_tx_electrodes, f54->num_rx_electrodes, sizeof(u16))),
> but rmi_f54_get_report_size() computes the size from
> drv_data->num_*_electrodes when those are set, i.e. from the F55
> function's electrode counts. Both counts come straight from device
> queries (F54 and F55 each report up to 255 electrodes) and nothing
> constrains the F55 counts to the F54 ones.
>
> A malicious or malfunctioning RMI4 device that reports larger F55
> electrode counts than its F54 counts makes report_size exceed the
> allocation, so the read loop writes past report_data (and the V4L2
> dequeue memcpy() then reads past it). On conforming hardware the F55
> configured electrodes are a subset of the F54 physical electrodes, so
> report_size never exceeds the buffer and well-behaved devices are
> unaffected.
>
> Record the allocation size and reject a report that does not fit,
> mirroring the existing zero-size check.
>
> Fixes: c762cc68b6a1 ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - propagate correct number of rx and tx electrodes to F54")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Thanks for the patch. It makes sense, but there are more changes needed
in F54. I incorporated it in the series I just posted, would appreviate
if you could review it.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-14 4:01 [PATCH] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - bound the F54 report size to the allocated buffer Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-26 5:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aj4LoEHHCMqUnyy2@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
--cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox