From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] ASoC: fsl_rpmsg: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:12:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajAISbgHDbQB7-cK@SMW015318> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615093824.115751-10-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 04:38:22PM +0700, phucduc.bui@gmail.com wrote:
> From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
>
> Clean up the code using guard() for mutex & spin locks.
> Merely code refactoring, and no behavior change.
>
> Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c | 69 +++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c
> index 031e5272215d..7210393dfa5d 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-rpmsg.c
> @@ -39,10 +39,9 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = info->rpdev;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&info->msg_lock);
> + guard(mutex)(&info->msg_lock);
> if (!rpdev) {
> dev_err(info->dev, "rpmsg channel not ready\n");
> - mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -55,15 +54,12 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
> sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "rpmsg_send failed: %d\n", ret);
> - mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> /* No receive msg for TYPE_C command */
> - if (msg->s_msg.header.type == MSG_TYPE_C) {
> - mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
> + if (msg->s_msg.header.type == MSG_TYPE_C)
> return 0;
> - }
>
> /* wait response from rpmsg */
> ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&info->cmd_complete,
> @@ -71,7 +67,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
> if (!ret) {
> dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "rpmsg_send cmd %d timeout!\n",
> msg->s_msg.header.cmd);
> - mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> @@ -100,8 +95,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_send_message(struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
> dev_dbg(&rpdev->dev, "cmd:%d, resp %d\n", msg->s_msg.header.cmd,
> info->r_msg.param.resp);
>
> - mutex_unlock(&info->msg_lock);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -109,14 +102,13 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_insert_workqueue(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> struct rpmsg_msg *msg,
> struct rpmsg_info *info)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> int ret = 0;
>
> /*
> * Queue the work to workqueue.
> * If the queue is full, drop the message.
> */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&info->wq_lock, flags);
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&info->wq_lock);
> if (info->work_write_index != info->work_read_index) {
> int index = info->work_write_index;
>
> @@ -130,7 +122,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_insert_workqueue(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> info->msg_drop_count[substream->stream]++;
> ret = -EPIPE;
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->wq_lock, flags);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -523,7 +514,6 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_ack(struct snd_soc_component *component,
> snd_pcm_sframes_t avail;
> struct timer_list *timer;
> struct rpmsg_msg *msg;
> - unsigned long flags;
> int buffer_tail = 0;
> int written_num;
>
> @@ -553,11 +543,11 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_ack(struct snd_soc_component *component,
> msg->s_msg.param.buffer_tail = buffer_tail;
>
> /* The notification message is updated to latest */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock[substream->stream], flags);
> - memcpy(&info->notify[substream->stream], msg,
> - sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
> - info->notify_updated[substream->stream] = true;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[substream->stream], flags);
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->lock[substream->stream]) {
> + memcpy(&info->notify[substream->stream], msg,
> + sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
> + info->notify_updated[substream->stream] = true;
> + }
>
> if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
> avail = snd_pcm_playback_hw_avail(runtime);
> @@ -640,7 +630,7 @@ static void imx_rpmsg_pcm_work(struct work_struct *work)
> bool is_notification = false;
> struct rpmsg_info *info;
> struct rpmsg_msg msg;
> - unsigned long flags;
> + bool updated;
>
> work_of_rpmsg = container_of(work, struct work_of_rpmsg, work);
> info = work_of_rpmsg->info;
> @@ -651,25 +641,26 @@ static void imx_rpmsg_pcm_work(struct work_struct *work)
> * enough data in M core side, need to let M core know
> * data is updated immediately.
> */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock[TX], flags);
> - if (info->notify_updated[TX]) {
> - memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[TX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
> - info->notify_updated[TX] = false;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[TX], flags);
> - info->send_message(&msg, info);
> - } else {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[TX], flags);
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->lock[TX]) {
> + updated = info->notify_updated[TX];
> + if (updated) {
> + memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[TX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
> + info->notify_updated[TX] = false;
> + }
> }
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock[RX], flags);
> - if (info->notify_updated[RX]) {
> - memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[RX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
> - info->notify_updated[RX] = false;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[RX], flags);
> + if (updated)
> info->send_message(&msg, info);
> - } else {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock[RX], flags);
> +
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->lock[RX]) {
> + updated = info->notify_updated[RX];
> + if (updated) {
> + memcpy(&msg, &info->notify[RX], sizeof(struct rpmsg_s_msg));
> + info->notify_updated[RX] = false;
> + }
> }
> + if (updated)
> + info->send_message(&msg, info);
> +
>
> /* Skip the notification message for it has been processed above */
> if (work_of_rpmsg->msg.s_msg.header.type == MSG_TYPE_C &&
> @@ -681,10 +672,10 @@ static void imx_rpmsg_pcm_work(struct work_struct *work)
> info->send_message(&work_of_rpmsg->msg, info);
>
> /* update read index */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&info->wq_lock, flags);
> - info->work_read_index++;
> - info->work_read_index %= WORK_MAX_NUM;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->wq_lock, flags);
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &info->wq_lock) {
> + info->work_read_index++;
> + info->work_read_index %= WORK_MAX_NUM;
> + }
> }
>
> static int imx_rpmsg_pcm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 9:38 [PATCH v2 00/11] ASoC: fsl: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:18 ` Frank Li
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] ASoC: fsl_audmix: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:30 ` Frank Li
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ASoC: fsl_easrc: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:24 ` Frank Li
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] ASoC: fsl_esai: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:15 ` Frank Li
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ASoC: fsl_spdif: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:17 ` Frank Li
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:25 ` Frank Li
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] ASoC: fsl_xcvr: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:19 ` Frank Li
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] ASoC: imx-audio-rpmsg: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:17 ` Frank Li
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] ASoC: fsl_rpmsg: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:12 ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] ASoC: fsl: mpc5200_dma: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:14 ` Frank Li
2026-06-15 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ASoC: fsl: mpc5200_psc_ac97: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-15 14:26 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajAISbgHDbQB7-cK@SMW015318 \
--to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox