The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	 Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
	 Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>,
	 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	 Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
	 Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Pratik R. Sampat" <pratikrajesh.sampat@amd.com>,
	 Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	 Roger Wang <runanwang@google.com>,
	Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>,
	 Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	 Jeremiah McReynolds <jmcrey@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/22] KVM: selftests: Add macros to simplify creating VM shapes for non-default types
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:51:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajF-9isiWxPyzxci@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0b99e9a-c20f-4def-ac4b-0070996c10ef@intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 5/22/2026 7:16 AM, Lisa Wang wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> > index dc70c6da63fa..041bdbfb93f7 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> > @@ -233,6 +233,19 @@ kvm_static_assert(sizeof(struct vm_shape) == sizeof(u64));
> >   	shape;					\
> >   })
> > +#define __VM_TYPE(__mode, __type)		\
> 
> It seems the name "__VM_SHAPE" fits better?
> 
> > +({						\
> > +	struct vm_shape shape = {		\
> > +		.mode = (__mode),		\
> > +		.type = (__type)		\
> > +	};					\
> > +						\
> > +	shape;					\
> > +})
> > +
> > +#define VM_TYPE(__type)				\
> > +	__VM_TYPE(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, __type)
> 
> and I think making it one line would be OK?
> 
> So something on top:
> 
> ---8<---
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> index 041bdbfb93f7..a1b5d2029d05 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> @@ -223,17 +223,7 @@ kvm_static_assert(sizeof(struct vm_shape) ==
> sizeof(u64));
> 
>  #define VM_TYPE_DEFAULT                        0
> 
> -#define VM_SHAPE(__mode)                       \
> -({                                             \
> -       struct vm_shape shape = {               \
> -               .mode = (__mode),               \
> -               .type = VM_TYPE_DEFAULT         \
> -       };                                      \
> -                                               \
> -       shape;                                  \
> -})
> -
> -#define __VM_TYPE(__mode, __type)              \
> +#define __VM_SHAPE(__mode, __type)             \
>  ({                                             \
>         struct vm_shape shape = {               \
>                 .mode = (__mode),               \
> @@ -243,8 +233,8 @@ kvm_static_assert(sizeof(struct vm_shape) ==
> sizeof(u64));
>         shape;                                  \
>  })
> 
> -#define VM_TYPE(__type)                                \
> -       __VM_TYPE(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, __type)
> +#define VM_SHAPE(__mode)       __VM_SHAPE(__mode, VM_TYPE_DEFAULT)
> +#define VM_TYPE(__type)                __VM_SHAPE(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, __type)

Oh, that's way better!  I say we go straight there:

--
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 21:20:27 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Add macros to simplify creating VM shapes for
 non-default types

Add VM_TYPE() and __VM_SHAPE() macros to create a vm_shape structure given
a type (and mode), and use the macros to define VM_SHAPE_{SEV,SEV_ES,SNP}
shapes for x86's SEV family of VM shapes.  Providing common infrastructure
will avoid having to copy+paste vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu() for TDX.

Use the new SEV+ shapes and drop vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu().

Opportunistically move the existing VM_SHAPE() (now __VM_SHAPE()) macro
below the definitions of VM_MODE_DEFAULT so that all of the SHAPE/TYPE
macros are bundled together.

No functional change intended.

Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h  | 28 +++++++------
 .../selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h     |  4 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/sev.h |  2 -
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/sev.c     | 16 --------
 .../selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c        | 40 +++++++++----------
 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
index dc70c6da63fa..46bae183d7fc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
@@ -221,18 +221,6 @@ struct vm_shape {
 
 kvm_static_assert(sizeof(struct vm_shape) == sizeof(u64));
 
-#define VM_TYPE_DEFAULT			0
-
-#define VM_SHAPE(__mode)			\
-({						\
-	struct vm_shape shape = {		\
-		.mode = (__mode),		\
-		.type = VM_TYPE_DEFAULT		\
-	};					\
-						\
-	shape;					\
-})
-
 extern enum vm_guest_mode vm_mode_default;
 
 #if defined(__aarch64__)
@@ -270,8 +258,24 @@ extern enum vm_guest_mode vm_mode_default;
 
 #endif
 
+#define VM_TYPE_DEFAULT			0
+
+#define __VM_SHAPE(__mode, __type)			\
+({						\
+	struct vm_shape shape = {		\
+		.mode = (__mode),		\
+		.type = (__type),		\
+	};					\
+						\
+	shape;					\
+})
+
+
+#define VM_SHAPE(__mode)	__VM_SHAPE(__mode, VM_TYPE_DEFAULT)
 #define VM_SHAPE_DEFAULT	VM_SHAPE(VM_MODE_DEFAULT)
 
+#define VM_TYPE(__type)		__VM_SHAPE(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, __type)
+
 #define MIN_PAGE_SIZE		(1U << MIN_PAGE_SHIFT)
 #define PTES_PER_MIN_PAGE	ptes_per_page(MIN_PAGE_SIZE)
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
index 77f576ee7789..0aa6eecfcbde 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
@@ -365,6 +365,10 @@ static inline unsigned int x86_model(unsigned int eax)
 	return ((eax >> 12) & 0xf0) | ((eax >> 4) & 0x0f);
 }
 
+#define VM_SHAPE_SEV		VM_TYPE(KVM_X86_SEV_VM)
+#define VM_SHAPE_SEV_ES		VM_TYPE(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM)
+#define VM_SHAPE_SNP		VM_TYPE(KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
+
 #define PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK      GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
 
 #define PAGE_SHIFT		12
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/sev.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/sev.h
index 1af44c151d60..944c59dbe510 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/sev.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/sev.h
@@ -53,8 +53,6 @@ void snp_vm_launch_start(struct kvm_vm *vm, u64 policy);
 void snp_vm_launch_update(struct kvm_vm *vm);
 void snp_vm_launch_finish(struct kvm_vm *vm);
 
-struct kvm_vm *vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(u32 type, void *guest_code,
-					   struct kvm_vcpu **cpu);
 void vm_sev_launch(struct kvm_vm *vm, u64 policy, u8 *measurement);
 
 kvm_static_assert(SEV_RET_SUCCESS == 0);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/sev.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/sev.c
index 93f916903461..95d8520eea34 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/sev.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/sev.c
@@ -158,22 +158,6 @@ void snp_vm_launch_finish(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 	vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH, &launch_finish);
 }
 
-struct kvm_vm *vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(u32 type, void *guest_code,
-					   struct kvm_vcpu **cpu)
-{
-	struct vm_shape shape = {
-		.mode = VM_MODE_DEFAULT,
-		.type = type,
-	};
-	struct kvm_vm *vm;
-	struct kvm_vcpu *cpus[1];
-
-	vm = __vm_create_with_vcpus(shape, 1, 0, guest_code, cpus);
-	*cpu = cpus[0];
-
-	return vm;
-}
-
 void vm_sev_launch(struct kvm_vm *vm, u64 policy, u8 *measurement)
 {
 	if (is_sev_snp_vm(vm)) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
index 1a49ee391586..fe2c438882ae 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void compare_xsave(u8 *from_host, u8 *from_guest)
 		abort();
 }
 
-static void test_sync_vmsa(u32 type, u64 policy)
+static void test_sync_vmsa(struct vm_shape shape, u64 policy)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct kvm_vm *vm;
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void test_sync_vmsa(u32 type, u64 policy)
 	double x87val = M_PI;
 	struct kvm_xsave __attribute__((aligned(64))) xsave = { 0 };
 
-	vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_code_xsave, &vcpu);
+	vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &vcpu, guest_code_xsave);
 	gva = vm_alloc_shared(vm, PAGE_SIZE, KVM_UTIL_MIN_VADDR,
 			      MEM_REGION_TEST_DATA);
 	hva = addr_gva2hva(vm, gva);
@@ -150,13 +150,13 @@ static void test_sync_vmsa(u32 type, u64 policy)
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 }
 
-static void test_sev(void *guest_code, u32 type, u64 policy)
+static void test_sev(void *guest_code, struct vm_shape shape, u64 policy)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct kvm_vm *vm;
 	struct ucall uc;
 
-	vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_code, &vcpu);
+	vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &vcpu, guest_code);
 
 	/* TODO: Validate the measurement is as expected. */
 	vm_sev_launch(vm, policy, NULL);
@@ -201,12 +201,12 @@ static void guest_shutdown_code(void)
 	__asm__ __volatile__("ud2");
 }
 
-static void test_sev_shutdown(u32 type, u64 policy)
+static void test_sev_shutdown(struct vm_shape shape, u64 policy)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct kvm_vm *vm;
 
-	vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_shutdown_code, &vcpu);
+	vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &vcpu, guest_shutdown_code);
 
 	vm_sev_launch(vm, policy, NULL);
 
@@ -218,28 +218,28 @@ static void test_sev_shutdown(u32 type, u64 policy)
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 }
 
-static void test_sev_smoke(void *guest, u32 type, u64 policy)
+static void test_sev_smoke(void *guest, struct vm_shape shape, u64 policy)
 {
 	const u64 xf_mask = XFEATURE_MASK_X87_AVX;
 
-	if (type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
-		test_sev(guest, type, policy | SNP_POLICY_DBG);
+	if (shape.type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
+		test_sev(guest, shape, policy | SNP_POLICY_DBG);
 	else
-		test_sev(guest, type, policy | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
-	test_sev(guest, type, policy);
+		test_sev(guest, shape, policy | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
+	test_sev(guest, shape, policy);
 
-	if (type == KVM_X86_SEV_VM)
+	if (shape.type == KVM_X86_SEV_VM)
 		return;
 
-	test_sev_shutdown(type, policy);
+	test_sev_shutdown(shape, policy);
 
 	if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS) &&
 	    (xgetbv(0) & kvm_cpu_supported_xcr0() & xf_mask) == xf_mask) {
-		test_sync_vmsa(type, policy);
-		if (type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
-			test_sync_vmsa(type, policy | SNP_POLICY_DBG);
+		test_sync_vmsa(shape, policy);
+		if (shape.type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
+			test_sync_vmsa(shape, policy | SNP_POLICY_DBG);
 		else
-			test_sync_vmsa(type, policy | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
+			test_sync_vmsa(shape, policy | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -247,13 +247,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
 	TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV));
 
-	test_sev_smoke(guest_sev_code, KVM_X86_SEV_VM, 0);
+	test_sev_smoke(guest_sev_code, VM_SHAPE_SEV, 0);
 
 	if (kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES))
-		test_sev_smoke(guest_sev_es_code, KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, SEV_POLICY_ES);
+		test_sev_smoke(guest_sev_es_code, VM_SHAPE_SEV_ES, SEV_POLICY_ES);
 
 	if (kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP))
-		test_sev_smoke(guest_snp_code, KVM_X86_SNP_VM, snp_default_policy());
+		test_sev_smoke(guest_snp_code, VM_SHAPE_SNP, snp_default_policy());
 
 	return 0;
 }

base-commit: e49bb0b5e1e3a8d7783bc7222c02cc6ff90fa2aa
--

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-21 23:16 [PATCH v13 00/22] TDX KVM selftests Lisa Wang
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 01/22] KVM: selftests: Add macros to simplify creating VM shapes for non-default types Lisa Wang
2026-06-16  8:57   ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-06-16 16:51     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 02/22] KVM: selftests: Update kvm_init_vm_address_properties() for TDX Lisa Wang
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 03/22] KVM: selftests: Initialize the TDX VM Lisa Wang
2026-06-08  5:57   ` Binbin Wu
2026-06-15 23:33     ` Lisa Wang
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 04/22] KVM: selftests: TDX: Use KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES to validate TDs' attribute configuration Lisa Wang
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 05/22] KVM: selftests: Expose segment definitions to assembly files Lisa Wang
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 06/22] tools: include: Add kbuild.h for assembly structure offsets Lisa Wang
2026-06-08  6:12   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 07/22] KVM: selftests: Introduce structures for TDX guest boot parameters Lisa Wang
2026-05-22 17:43   ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-05-22 23:05     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-22 23:50       ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-05-28 19:25         ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 08/22] KVM: selftests: Add TDX boot code Lisa Wang
2026-06-16  9:21   ` Chenyi Qiang
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 09/22] KVM: selftests: Expose functions to get default sregs values Lisa Wang
2026-06-08  6:39   ` Binbin Wu
2026-06-15 10:54     ` Chenyi Qiang
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 10/22] KVM: selftests: Set up TDX boot code region Lisa Wang
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 11/22] KVM: selftests: Set up TDX boot parameters region Lisa Wang
2026-06-08  7:23   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 12/22] KVM: selftests: Back the first memory region with guest_memfd for TDX Lisa Wang
2026-06-08  7:31   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 13/22] KVM: selftests: Set first memory region as shared if guest_memfd Lisa Wang
2026-06-08  8:03   ` Binbin Wu
2026-06-16  0:04     ` Lisa Wang
2026-06-15 23:46   ` Ackerley Tng
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 14/22] KVM: selftests: Expose function to allocate vCPU stack Lisa Wang
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 15/22] KVM: selftests: Call KVM_TDX_INIT_VCPU when creating a new TDX vcpu Lisa Wang
2026-06-08  8:34   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 16/22] KVM: selftests: Load per-vCPU guest stack in TDX boot parameters Lisa Wang
2026-06-09  5:37   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 17/22] KVM: selftests: Set entry point for TDX guest code Lisa Wang
2026-05-21 23:16 ` [PATCH v13 18/22] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to init TDX memory and finalize VM Lisa Wang
2026-05-21 23:17 ` [PATCH v13 19/22] KVM: selftests: Finalize TD memory as part of kvm_arch_vm_finalize_vcpus Lisa Wang
2026-06-05 13:58   ` Ackerley Tng
2026-06-05 17:58     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-06-05 18:27       ` Ackerley Tng
2026-06-05 20:48         ` Sean Christopherson
2026-06-16  0:26           ` Ackerley Tng
2026-06-16 14:36             ` Sean Christopherson
2026-06-16 16:13               ` Ackerley Tng
2026-06-16 17:06                 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-21 23:17 ` [PATCH v13 20/22] KVM: selftests: Implement MMIO WRITE for the TDX VM Lisa Wang
2026-06-09  6:45   ` Binbin Wu
2026-06-16 18:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-21 23:17 ` [PATCH v13 21/22] KVM: selftests: Add ucall support for TDX Lisa Wang
2026-06-16 18:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-21 23:17 ` [PATCH v13 22/22] KVM: selftests: Add TDX lifecycle test Lisa Wang
2026-06-16 17:51 ` [PATCH v13 00/22] TDX KVM selftests Ackerley Tng
2026-06-16 18:48   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajF-9isiWxPyzxci@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=afranji@google.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=jmcrey@google.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pratikrajesh.sampat@amd.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=runanwang@google.com \
    --cc=sagis@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wyihan@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox