From: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
To: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
liam@infradead.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/slub: preserve previous object lifetime in user tracking
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:54:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajJMzHe3W8a8NGqK@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616141410.52117-3-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 10:14:08PM +0800, Pengpeng Hou wrote:
> SLAB_STORE_USER stores one allocation track and one free track for an
> object. When that object is reused, the next allocation overwrites the
> allocation track. If a stale pointer from the previous lifetime is later
> freed or otherwise reported, the free/check report can contain the victim
> allocation and the stale operation while the previous completed alloc/free
> pair has already been overwritten.
>
> Keep one previous completed lifetime in the existing user tracking
> metadata. When an object is allocated and the current allocation/free
> tracks both exist, copy that completed lifetime to the previous-lifetime
> slots before recording the new allocation. Clear the current free track
> when the new allocation begins so the current lifetime does not continue
> to display a free from the old lifetime.
>
> Print the previous object lifetime when it is available. This is
> diagnostic information only; it does not infer semantic ownership or
> identify the root cause of a use-after-free.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 43d4febd5bf2..358f42e92207 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -327,7 +327,13 @@ struct track {
> unsigned long when; /* When did the operation occur */
> };
>
> -enum track_item { TRACK_ALLOC, TRACK_FREE, TRACK_NR };
> +enum track_item {
> + TRACK_ALLOC,
> + TRACK_FREE,
> + TRACK_PREV_ALLOC,
> + TRACK_PREV_FREE,
> + TRACK_NR,
> +};
>
> static inline unsigned int user_tracking_size(slab_flags_t flags)
> {
> @@ -1080,12 +1086,37 @@ static void set_track_update(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> p->when = jiffies;
> }
>
> -static __always_inline void set_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> - enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags)
> +static bool track_has_record(const struct track *t)
> +{
> + return t->addr;
> +}
how about inline it
> +
> +static void clear_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> + enum track_item track)
> +{
> + memset(get_track(s, object, track), 0, sizeof(struct track));
> +}
> +
> +static void save_previous_lifetime(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> +{
> + struct track *alloc = get_track(s, object, TRACK_ALLOC);
> + struct track *free = get_track(s, object, TRACK_FREE);
> +
> + if (!track_has_record(alloc) || !track_has_record(free))
> + return;
> +
> + *get_track(s, object, TRACK_PREV_ALLOC) = *alloc;
> + *get_track(s, object, TRACK_PREV_FREE) = *free;
Maybe we can use memcpy instead of copying them one by one.
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void set_alloc_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> + unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags)
> {
> depot_stack_handle_t handle = set_track_prepare(gfp_flags);
>
> - set_track_update(s, object, alloc, addr, handle);
> + save_previous_lifetime(s, object);
> + set_track_update(s, object, TRACK_ALLOC, addr, handle);
> + clear_track(s, object, TRACK_FREE);
sashiko has a comment:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616141410.52117-1-pengpeng%40iscas.ac.cn
It seems a simple fix could be removing clear_track() and allow the stale free
track.
> }
>
> static void init_tracking(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> @@ -1120,11 +1151,22 @@ static void print_track(const char *s, struct track *t, unsigned long pr_time)
> void print_tracking(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> {
> unsigned long pr_time = jiffies;
> + struct track *prev_alloc;
> + struct track *prev_free;
> +
> if (!(s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER))
> return;
>
> print_track("Allocated", get_track(s, object, TRACK_ALLOC), pr_time);
> print_track("Freed", get_track(s, object, TRACK_FREE), pr_time);
> +
> + prev_alloc = get_track(s, object, TRACK_PREV_ALLOC);
> + prev_free = get_track(s, object, TRACK_PREV_FREE);
> + if (track_has_record(prev_alloc) || track_has_record(prev_free)) {
> + pr_err("Previous object lifetime:\n");
> + print_track("Previously allocated", prev_alloc, pr_time);
> + print_track("Previously freed", prev_free, pr_time);
> + }
> }
>
> static void print_slab_info(const struct slab *slab)
> @@ -1371,10 +1413,12 @@ check_bytes_and_report(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> *
> * [Metadata starts at object + s->inuse]
> * - A. freelist pointer (if freeptr_outside_object)
> - * - B. alloc tracking (SLAB_STORE_USER)
> - * - C. free tracking (SLAB_STORE_USER)
> - * - D. original request size (SLAB_KMALLOC && SLAB_STORE_USER)
> - * - E. KASAN metadata (if enabled)
> + * - B. current alloc tracking (SLAB_STORE_USER)
> + * - C. current free tracking (SLAB_STORE_USER)
> + * - D. previous alloc tracking (SLAB_STORE_USER)
> + * - E. previous free tracking (SLAB_STORE_USER)
> + * - F. original request size (SLAB_KMALLOC && SLAB_STORE_USER)
> + * - G. KASAN metadata (if enabled)
> *
> * [Mandatory padding] (if CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG && SLAB_RED_ZONE)
> * - One mandatory debug word to guarantee a minimum poisoned gap
> @@ -2029,8 +2073,8 @@ static inline void slab_pad_check(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab) {}
> static inline int check_object(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> void *object, u8 val) { return 1; }
> static inline depot_stack_handle_t set_track_prepare(gfp_t gfp_flags) { return 0; }
> -static inline void set_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> - enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags) {}
> +static inline void set_alloc_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
> + unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags) {}
> static inline void add_full(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
> struct slab *slab) {}
> static inline void remove_full(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
> @@ -4522,7 +4566,7 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
>
> success:
> if (kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_STORE_USER))
> - set_track(s, object, TRACK_ALLOC, addr, gfpflags);
> + set_alloc_track(s, object, addr, gfpflags);
>
> return object;
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Thanks,
Hao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 14:14 [PATCH 0/4] mm/slub: preserve previous object lifetime Pengpeng Hou
2026-06-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/slub: factor user tracking metadata size calculation Pengpeng Hou
2026-06-17 4:26 ` Hao Li
2026-06-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/slub: preserve previous object lifetime in user tracking Pengpeng Hou
2026-06-17 7:54 ` Hao Li [this message]
2026-06-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/slub: test previous lifetime tracking Pengpeng Hou
2026-06-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] Documentation/mm: document SLUB " Pengpeng Hou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajJMzHe3W8a8NGqK@fedora \
--to=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox