The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Yi Sun <yi.sun@unisoc.com>
Cc: yury.norov@gmail.com, mina86@mina86.com, 279644543@qq.com,
	mnazarewicz@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	akinobu.mita@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	john.stultz@linaro.org, tjmercier@google.com,
	qiang.zhao@freescale.com, scottwood@freescale.com,
	benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org, fvdl@google.com, tglx@kernel.org,
	andreas.herrmann@calxeda.com, song@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	sasha.levin@oracle.com, minchan@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] lib: bitmap: add tests for bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off()
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 01:48:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajOGiVtCmnU9OjJP@yury> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260618015252.3601554-2-yi.sun@unisoc.com>

On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 09:52:51AM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> Add functional and performance tests
> for bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off().
> 
> To maintain consistent output format,
> use "find_next_0_area" instead of
> "bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off".
> 
> performance tests partial output:
> Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
> [    0.191166] find_next_0_area:              1521308 ns,   1326 iterations
> [    0.192552] find_next_bit:                 1382385 ns, 163724 iterations
> Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
> [    0.196835] find_next_0_area:              4250307 ns, 322497 iterations
> [    0.196853] find_next_bit:                   15077 ns,    656 iterations
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.sun@unisoc.com>
> ---
>  lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  lib/test_bitmap.c        | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
> index 00d9dc61cd46..062a69930d83 100644
> --- a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
> +++ b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,21 @@ static int __init test_find_next_and_bit(const void *bitmap,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int __init
> +test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len)
> +{
> +	unsigned long i, cnt;
> +	ktime_t time;
> +
> +	time = ktime_get();
> +	for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++)
> +		i = bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN, i, 8, 0, 0) + 1;
> +	time = ktime_get() - time;
> +	pr_err("find_next_0_area:   %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);

Change %18llu to %14llu (or whatever), and keep the name as it should.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int __init find_bit_test(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nbits = BITMAP_LEN / SPARSE;
> @@ -158,6 +173,7 @@ static int __init find_bit_test(void)
>  	get_random_bytes(bitmap, sizeof(bitmap));
>  	get_random_bytes(bitmap2, sizeof(bitmap2));
>  
> +	test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
>  	test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
>  	test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
>  	test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
> @@ -181,6 +197,7 @@ static int __init find_bit_test(void)
>  		__set_bit(get_random_u32_below(BITMAP_LEN), bitmap2);
>  	}
>  
> +	test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
>  	test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
>  	test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
>  	test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
> diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c
> index 69813c10e6c0..12aa2ca37fe1 100644
> --- a/lib/test_bitmap.c
> +++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,43 @@ static void __init test_find_nth_bit(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void __init
> +test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(void)
> +{
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(bmap, 192);
> +
> +	bitmap_set(bmap, 0, 192);
> +
> +	bitmap_clear(bmap, 0, 8);
> +	__clear_bit(50, bmap);
> +	bitmap_clear(bmap, 60, 18);
> +	__set_bit(69, bmap);
> +	__clear_bit(80, bmap);
> +	bitmap_clear(bmap, 100, 10);
> +	__clear_bit(120, bmap);
> +	bitmap_clear(bmap, 145, 8);
> +	bitmap_clear(bmap, 160, 32);
> +
> +	expect_eq_uint(0,
> +		bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bmap, 192, 0, 8, 0, 0));
> +	expect_eq_uint(0,
> +		bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bmap, 192, 0, 8, 3, 0));
> +	expect_eq_uint(163,
> +		bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bmap, 192, 0, 8, 3, 1));
> +	expect_eq_uint(60,
> +		bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bmap, 192, 1, 8, 0, 0));
> +	expect_eq_uint(160,
> +		bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bmap, 192, 1, 8, 7, 0));
> +	expect_eq_uint(60,
> +		bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bmap, 192, 1, 8, 7, 4));
> +	expect_eq_uint(100,
> +		bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bmap, 192, 0, 10, 0, 0));
> +	expect_eq_uint(160,
> +		bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bmap, 192, 0, 32, 0, 0));
> +	expect_eq_uint(1,
> +		!!(bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bmap, 192, 0, 33, 0, 0) > 192));

It should be >= here.

> +}
> +
>  static void __init test_fill_set(void)
>  {
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(bmap, 1024);
> @@ -1559,6 +1596,7 @@ static void __init selftest(void)
>  	test_for_each_clear_bitrange_from();
>  	test_for_each_set_clump8();
>  	test_for_each_set_bit_wrap();
> +	test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off();
>  }
>  
>  KSTM_MODULE_LOADERS(test_bitmap);
> -- 
> 2.34.1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-18  1:52 [PATCH v5 0/2] Improve the performance of bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off() Yi Sun
2026-06-18  1:52 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] lib: bitmap: add tests for bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off() Yi Sun
2026-06-18  5:48   ` Yury Norov [this message]
2026-06-18  9:43     ` 答复: " 孙毅 (Yi Sun)
2026-06-18 12:44     ` 孙毅 (Yi Sun)
2026-06-18  1:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] lib: bitmap: optimize bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off() Yi Sun
2026-06-18  6:14   ` Yury Norov
2026-06-18  9:29     ` 答复: " 孙毅 (Yi Sun)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajOGiVtCmnU9OjJP@yury \
    --to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=279644543@qq.com \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann@calxeda.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mnazarewicz@gmail.com \
    --cc=qiang.zhao@freescale.com \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tjmercier@google.com \
    --cc=yi.sun@unisoc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox