From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Reject truncated acpi_rsdp= values
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:03:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajQI0mJwobsGHj6F@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260618045400.GCajN56AKctO0qB-sF@fat_crate.local>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 09:54:00PM -0700, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 03:04:18PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> > cmdline_find_option() returns the full length of the argument value even
> > if it is truncated. However, get_cmdline_acpi_rsdp() only checks whether
> > acpi_rsdp= is present and does not reject truncated values that do not
> > fit in the buffer.
> >
> > Reject truncated values early to prevent boot_kstrtoul() from parsing a
> > partial value and thus from silently using the wrong RSDP address.
>
> And?
>
> If it uses the wrong address, it'll crash'n'burn later. As it should be.
The problem is that we don't necessarily use the user-supplied address.
get_cmdline_acpi_rsdp() can truncate it into a different, parseable
address and use that instead. That might not crash at all.
We already return 0 and fail gracefully when boot_kstrtoul() cannot
parse the value; this does the same when cmdline_find_option() reports
the value was truncated because it didn't fit the buffer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 13:04 [PATCH] x86/boot: Reject truncated acpi_rsdp= values Thorsten Blum
2026-06-18 4:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-18 15:03 ` Thorsten Blum [this message]
2026-06-18 16:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-18 17:59 ` Thorsten Blum
2026-06-18 18:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-18 18:57 ` Thorsten Blum
2026-06-18 19:34 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajQI0mJwobsGHj6F@linux.dev \
--to=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox