The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: hexlabsecurity@proton.me, Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
	"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>,
	Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Raspl <raspl@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] net/smc: bound the send length to the send buffer in smc_tx_sendmsg()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:08:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajQX7_9xFI9GSaq5@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260614-b4-disp-edd64be9-v3-3-551fa514257e@proton.me>

On 2026-06-14 03:23:32, Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay wrote:
>From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
>
>On the SMC-D DMB-merge (nocopy) path, smc_cdc_msg_recv_action() advances
>conn->sndbuf_space from the peer's consumer cursor:
>
>	diff_tx = smc_curs_diff(sndbuf_desc->len, &tx_curs_fin,
>				&local_rx_ctrl.cons);
>	atomic_add(diff_tx, &conn->sndbuf_space);
>
>The consumer cursor is wire-controlled and unvalidated, and
>smc_curs_diff()'s differing-wrap branch can return more than
>sndbuf_desc->len, so a forged cursor drives sndbuf_space past the send
>buffer (and across many CDC messages can overflow the signed counter
>negative).  smc_tx_sendmsg() reads it as the available write space and
>performs a wrap-around copy whose second chunk (copylen - first_chunk,
>written at ring offset 0) is never re-bounded to sndbuf_desc->len,
>writing user data past the send buffer -- a heap out-of-bounds write of
>attacker-influenced length and content.

Hi Bryam,

I think this is the same as patch #2.

Best regards,
Dust


>
>Bound the write space to sndbuf_desc->len where it is consumed, treating
>a negative (sign-overflowed) value as out of range too, so the copy
>length can never exceed the ring.  This enforces the documented
>0 <= sndbuf_space <= sndbuf_desc->len invariant at the producer,
>race-free against the CDC tasklet that advances sndbuf_space.
>
>Fixes: cc0ab806fc52 ("net/smc: adapt cursor update when sndbuf and peer DMB are merged")
>Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
>---
> net/smc/smc_tx.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.c b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
>index 3144b4b1fe29..5916f02060fb 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
>@@ -233,6 +233,19 @@ int smc_tx_sendmsg(struct smc_sock *smc, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> 		/* initialize variables for 1st iteration of subsequent loop */
> 		/* could be just 1 byte, even after smc_tx_wait above */
> 		writespace = atomic_read(&conn->sndbuf_space);
>+		/* sndbuf_space is advanced from the peer's wire-controlled
>+		 * consumer cursor on the SMC-D DMB-merge path; a forged cursor
>+		 * can inflate it past the send buffer, or overflow the signed
>+		 * accumulator to a negative value across many CDC messages
>+		 * (which a plain "> len" check would miss before the size_t
>+		 * cast below turns it huge).  Bound it to the send buffer in
>+		 * either case so the wrap-around write cannot run past
>+		 * sndbuf_desc->len.  This enforces the documented
>+		 * 0 <= sndbuf_space <= sndbuf_desc->len invariant at the
>+		 * producer, race-free against the CDC tasklet.
>+		 */
>+		if (writespace < 0 || writespace > conn->sndbuf_desc->len)
>+			writespace = conn->sndbuf_desc->len;
> 		/* not more than what user space asked for */
> 		copylen = min_t(size_t, send_remaining, writespace);
> 		/* determine start of sndbuf */
>
>-- 
>2.43.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-14  8:23 [PATCH v3 0/3] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-14  8:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] net/smc: bound the wire-controlled producer cursor to the RMB Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-18 14:29   ` Dust Li
2026-06-14  8:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] net/smc: bound the receive length to the RMB in smc_rx_recvmsg() Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-18 16:03   ` Dust Li
2026-06-14  8:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] net/smc: bound the send length to the send buffer in smc_tx_sendmsg() Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-18 16:08   ` Dust Li [this message]
2026-06-17 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajQX7_9xFI9GSaq5@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=raspl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox