Re: [PATCH v6 06/16] iio: core: create local __iio_chan_prefix_emit() for reuse

["Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 09:14:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 05:14:19PM +0100, Rodrigo Alencar wrote:
> > On 18/06/26 16:06, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 02:27:22PM +0100, Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > +	dev_attr->attr.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s%s", prefix, postfix);
> > > > +	if (!dev_attr->attr.name)
> > > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > > 
> > > I don't oppose the change. Looks like a nice cleanup.
> 
> May I oppose it? I found use scnprintf() is harder to follow in comparison to
> nice kasprintf() that takes care for the dynamically allocated buffer.

Tend to agree a bit given I was used to the older code. So matching the
old logic with the new one is an exercise, yes.

> 
> Also there is a chance to get a name silently cut due to insufficient space.
> Besides that this function can't be used (again due to 'c') in kasprintf()-like
> wrapper. I do not consider this as a good approach. Have you looked at seq_buf
> instead?

Not so sure the above bothers me that much.

> 
> > > But bear in mind this very sensible as any subtle mistake means ABI breakage.
> 
> Which immediately raises a question of test coverage. Do we have one? If not,
> this code must be accompanied with one.

The above is the more concerning part to me.

- Nuno Sá

> 
> > Yes! I tried to be careful... this is dangerous stuff!
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
>