From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Use presence checks for syscon props
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 11:56:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajl3U87N9IUxV979@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612214959.1884404-1-robh@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 04:49:58PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> The OMAP and Keystone remoteproc drivers only need to know whether
> "ti,bootreg" and "ti,syscon-dev" are present before parsing them.
> Reading those properties as booleans misrepresents their DT encoding.
>
> Use of_property_present() for the presence tests and keep the existing
> phandle parsing for the actual property values.
>
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5-5
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
> index e7fde5509786..83763d640c4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static int keystone_rproc_of_get_dev_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> - if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "ti,syscon-dev")) {
> + if (!of_property_present(np, "ti,syscon-dev")) {
> dev_err(dev, "ti,syscon-dev property is absent\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> index cb01354248af..6ed0f28edac9 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ static int omap_rproc_get_boot_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (!data)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "ti,bootreg"))
> + if (!of_property_present(np, "ti,bootreg"))
> return 0;
>
I'll apply this when rc1 comes out next week.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> oproc->boot_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*oproc->boot_data),
> --
> 2.53.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-22 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 21:49 [PATCH] remoteproc: Use presence checks for syscon props Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-06-22 17:56 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajl3U87N9IUxV979@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox