The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: leixiang <leixiang@kylinos.cn>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	 "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,  "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	 Suresh Warrier <warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,  kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Nullify irqfd->producer when add_producer() fails
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 09:40:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak59frQUBl9Gs3Qn@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1782119051448443.14545.seg@mailgw.kylinos.cn>

On Mon, Jun 22, 2026, leixiang wrote:
> The x86 and powerpc add_producer() callbacks set irqfd->producer before the
> fallible setup and never clear it on error.  The bypass manager doesn't
> register a producer whose add_producer() failed -- producer->eventfd is
> left NULL, so the later unregister early-returns and del_producer() is
> never called -- so nothing ever drops the pointer.
> 
> For VFIO PCI the producer is embedded in struct vfio_pci_irq_ctx and freed
> when the vector is disabled, after which a routing update dereferences the
> dangling pointer via kvm_arch_update_irqfd_routing().
> 
> Nullify irqfd->producer on the error paths.
> 
> Fixes: 77e1b8332d1d ("KVM: x86: Decouple device assignment from IRQ bypass")
> Fixes: c57875f5f9be ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Enable IRQ bypass")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: leixiang <leixiang@kylinos.cn>

Please post the PPC patch as a separate patch.  x86 and PPC are separate maintainer
domains and the backports will likely need to go to different LTS kernels.

I'll grab/extract the x86 change from here (and I'll massage the changelog as
appropriate).

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 4 +++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/irq.c           | 4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 61dbeea317f3..14919b76fb32 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -6114,9 +6114,11 @@ static int kvmppc_irq_bypass_add_producer_hv(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
>  	irqfd->producer = prod;
> 
>  	ret = kvmppc_set_passthru_irq(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, irqfd->gsi);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
>  		pr_info("kvmppc_set_passthru_irq (irq %d, gsi %d) fails: %d\n",
>  			prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, ret);
> +		irqfd->producer = NULL;
> +	}

Unlike x86, AFAICT there's no need to set irqfd->producer before configuring
the passthru/bypass stuff.  So I think that fix could be this?

diff --git arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 61dbeea317f3..ff7b25629125 100644
--- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -6111,12 +6111,12 @@ static int kvmppc_irq_bypass_add_producer_hv(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
        struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
                container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
 
-       irqfd->producer = prod;
-
        ret = kvmppc_set_passthru_irq(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, irqfd->gsi);
        if (ret)
                pr_info("kvmppc_set_passthru_irq (irq %d, gsi %d) fails: %d\n",
                        prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, ret);
+       else
+               irqfd->producer = prod;
 
        return ret;
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-22  7:51 [PATCH] KVM: Nullify irqfd->producer when add_producer() fails leixiang
2026-07-08 16:40 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-07-09  5:45   ` leixiang
2026-07-09  5:57   ` [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Set irqfd->producer only on success leixiang
2026-07-09  7:39     ` Vaibhav Jain
2026-07-09  9:39     ` Amit Machhiwal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-22  7:51 [PATCH] KVM: Nullify irqfd->producer when add_producer() fails leixiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ak59frQUBl9Gs3Qn@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leixiang@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox