From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 405E93630BA for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 10:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782730541; cv=none; b=Q4FKFcKLrHfhH5JW4VarwhLPooswr38jrvx4BDsxpNZIXTLl9xnsDdK+73gR7RMEWHfPdxVVLvSnIfCAvFUg50jMaMwzMXEE4p9jm2ZRT/ju+WCDCkq1lRGBljOZthRjI8iuZhjSPXCqhY9ZJ7m/mfDMmC7CCGUJ12NlrAL3R8s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782730541; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XKfimtIR+il32u0UDPqnf5oheier5kQZfQrahbFYCuc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Wkh6xJtN1xbLrisrtqMU/n9cHseHfP44KGc82IQTrpT0fwqe71MFh0VOKbFkiHF8tsy3P/YCvWQ95oYdHgybFvZ9cLB/+pdKVD5HpleNh31mUGaBD9wPMtkYloL/Rqow7smbH1fncs6X4yPTttGgSRNp9ABNEzObwlyLA8wLGwE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=DMIFmaxu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="DMIFmaxu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=XKfi mtIR+il32u0UDPqnf5oheier5kQZfQrahbFYCuc=; b=DMIFmaxucrIhIz8myJFC Rk+9t1Yg3xaxT2lz33GkRKubfLHKCNwaL5Uq+4m9SIFj93Yp8KVoPmux+Uq2szHh W6O/7dvMztx0RvzX/tYVFV/uCMYVEds+B0vVhJi67nRUvToeNLuZviANlkDgsiwP F+4baShcvu+cWUysUFjI88Quaw54KLIMyuvKaAGC4Kha0Y9arg+wcmFone1CzkTI swd544D/BxPYr+Y8ccvKSJpQsy7p13Xeyl4Y5DfL5ivo1MkHmcGtkmBHD1n83LEX 9ekBuRHQue3oYaNUSnP0AnNPDLeHx4AVrcwi7ONYKNY+MlMUFMigksdndhUV+Jvm NQ== Received: (qmail 347391 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2026 12:55:38 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 29 Jun 2026 12:55:38 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@6OlzTGJV3ucujntC Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 12:55:37 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Matthew Wilcox , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, Baolin Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] hwspinlock: add summary in debugfs Message-ID: References: <20260622085204.54248-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > My 2c that we should follow the IWYU principle. XArray header is not generic > enough that we may rely on something else to provide it. And hence I'm fully > with including that explicitly. That mentioned users simply neglected the > principle and I consider that as an inconvenience. I tend to agree, would need some more checks, though, to keep the amount of patches low enough.