From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
joro@8bytes.org, kees@kernel.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, miko.lenczewski@arm.com,
smostafa@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, jamien@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v6 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Skip RMR bypass for kdump adoption
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:28:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akKdJFx7zhWtpjBT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88e75018e94adc2eb3db8c1fd97c3cc738c170bb.1779265413.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:03:23AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> RMR bypass STEs are installed during SMMUv3 probe for StreamIDs listed by
> IORT RMR nodes. A normal boot switches the driver to a fresh stream table
> whose initial STEs abort, so those RMR SIDs need bypass entries before it
> becomes live. This preserves firmware/guest-owned traffic, including vSMMU
> guest MSI cases built around RMR-described SIDs.
>
> ARM_SMMU_OPT_KDUMP_ADOPT is the opposite case: the driver keeps SMMUEN set
> and adopts the crashed kernel's stream table, so RMR SIDs already have the
> only translation state known to be safe for active in-flight DMA. Replacing
> an adopted STE with bypass can turn translated DMA into physical DMA, then
> point it at the wrong memory.
>
> arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste() also rewrites the STE in place after clearing it
> first. While the table is live, a concurrent hardware STE fetch can observe
> V=0 or mixed old/new state.
>
> Leaving the adopted STE unmodified keeps the kdump kernel using the crashed
> kernel's translation. That gives the endpoint driver a chance to probe and
> quiesce the device.
>
> If the old STE was already abort or invalid, installing bypass would create
> new DMA permission; leaving it alone is a safer failure mode. Later domain
> setup still gets the RMR direct mappings through the reserved-region path.
>
> Fixes: b63b3439b856 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Abort all transactions if SMMU is enabled in kdump kernel")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.12+
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
Thanks,
Praan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 17:03 [PATCH rc v6 0/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix device crash on kdump kernel Nicolin Chen
2026-05-20 17:03 ` [PATCH rc v6 1/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_kdump_adopt_strtab() for kdump Nicolin Chen
2026-06-28 23:00 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-29 4:01 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-05-20 17:03 ` [PATCH rc v6 2/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Implement is_attach_deferred() " Nicolin Chen
2026-06-28 23:06 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-20 17:03 ` [PATCH rc v6 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not enable EVTQ/PRIQ interrupts in kdump kernel Nicolin Chen
2026-06-29 8:48 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-30 4:14 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-06-30 4:58 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-30 5:00 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-30 5:36 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-05-20 17:03 ` [PATCH rc v6 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Skip EVTQ/PRIQ setup " Nicolin Chen
2026-06-29 15:15 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-30 4:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-06-30 5:01 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-20 17:03 ` [PATCH rc v6 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Retain CR0_SMMUEN during kdump device reset Nicolin Chen
2026-06-29 16:24 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-20 17:03 ` [PATCH rc v6 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Skip RMR bypass for kdump adoption Nicolin Chen
2026-06-29 16:28 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-05-20 17:03 ` [PATCH rc v6 7/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Detect ARM_SMMU_OPT_KDUMP_ADOPT in probe() Nicolin Chen
2026-06-29 16:40 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-30 4:19 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akKdJFx7zhWtpjBT@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jamien@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox