From: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
david@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
tj@kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
liam@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
mhocko@suse.com, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
vbabka@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/vmpressure: split v1 userspace eventfd code into vmpressure-v1.c
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 19:13:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akKnaWhg5z7fI5CC@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb9af391-b991-41fc-a105-7a3008860c07@linux.dev>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 694 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 04:20:10PM +0100, Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev> wrote:
> So what I mean is that I want to keep the effect of the patch that splits
> off v1 code as just that and not have the optimization of not running
> vmpressure for tree = true + cgroup v2.
>
> vmpressure_v1_account_tree() compiles to an empty function in the split
> patch for cgroup v2, so if we make the splitting out v1 code as the first
> patch, the commit is not just going to split v1 code but also do the
> optimization of not running tree = true cgroup v2.
>
> I hope it makes sense?
All clear now, it's clicked for me what is the optimization and what the
cleanup.
Thanks,
Michal
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 265 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 12:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/vmpressure: reduce CPU, memory and code overhead on cgroup v2 Usama Arif
2026-06-29 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/vmpressure: skip tree=true accounting " Usama Arif
2026-06-29 16:46 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-06-29 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/vmpressure: split v1 userspace eventfd code into vmpressure-v1.c Usama Arif
2026-06-29 13:34 ` Michal Koutný
2026-06-29 13:55 ` Usama Arif
2026-06-29 14:29 ` Michal Koutný
2026-06-29 15:20 ` Usama Arif
2026-06-29 17:13 ` Michal Koutný [this message]
2026-06-29 15:57 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-06-29 16:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-06-29 17:23 ` Usama Arif
2026-06-29 18:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-06-29 18:28 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akKnaWhg5z7fI5CC@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox