From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
"Aaron Tomlin" <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
"Guopeng Zhang" <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v9 01/11] cgroup/cpuset: Make nr_deadline_tasks an atomic_t
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:01:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akPMKXppWM74-m9a@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630033344.352702-2-longman@redhat.com>
Hi Waiman,
On 29/06/26 23:33, Waiman Long wrote:
> The nr_deadline_tasks variable in the cpuset structure was introduced by
> commit 6c24849f5515 ("sched/cpuset: Keep track of SCHED_DEADLINE task
> in cpusets"). It is reported by sashiko [1] that nr_deadline_tasks
> can currently be modified by inc_dl_tasks_cs() under rq->lock and
> by cpuset_attach() under cpuset_mutex. So if both updates happen
> simultaneously, the nr_deadline_tasks variable can be corrupted leading
> to incorrect operations down the road.
>
> Fix that by changing its type to atomic_t so that nr_deadline_tasks are
> always atomically updated.
>
> [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260626181923.133658-1-longman%40redhat.comk
>
> Fixes: 6c24849f5515 ("sched/cpuset: Keep track of SCHED_DEADLINE task in cpusets")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
Looks like Sashiko is yet not completely happy with this:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630033344.352702-1-longman%40redhat.com
I actually wondered the same and couldn't convince myself we don't
actually have that problem with the window between sched_setscheduler()
and cpuset_attach(). If issue is confirmed, not sure if wait_attach_
done_lock() could help here as well? It's kind of a big lock for the
scheduler, but maybe only affecting DEADLINE tasks and if migrations
are ongoing.
Thanks,
Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 3:33 [PATCH-next v9 00/11] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source/destination cpusets for cpuset_*attach() Waiman Long
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 01/11] cgroup/cpuset: Make nr_deadline_tasks an atomic_t Waiman Long
2026-06-30 14:01 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2026-06-30 17:56 ` Waiman Long
2026-07-01 9:00 ` Juri Lelli
2026-07-01 1:19 ` Ridong Chen
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 02/11] cgroup/cpuset: Fix node inconsistencies between cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask() and cpuset_attach() Waiman Long
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 03/11] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent race between task attach and cpuset state change Waiman Long
2026-07-01 1:41 ` Ridong Chen
2026-07-01 20:19 ` Waiman Long
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 04/11] cgroup/cpuset: Put all task attach related variables into attach_ctx Waiman Long
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 05/11] cgroup/cpuset: Add a cpuset_reserve_dl_bw() helper Waiman Long
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 06/11] cgroup/cpuset: Expand the scope of cpuset_can_attach_check() Waiman Long
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 07/11] cgroup/cpuset: Make attach_ctx.old_cs track task group leader Waiman Long
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 08/11] cgroup/cpuset: Move mpol_rebind_mm/cpuset_migrate_mm() calls inside cpuset_attach_task() Waiman Long
2026-07-01 2:14 ` Ridong Chen
2026-07-01 20:30 ` Waiman Long
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 09/11] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple source cpusets for cpuset_*attach() Waiman Long
2026-07-01 2:35 ` Ridong Chen
2026-07-01 20:44 ` Waiman Long
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 10/11] cgroup/cpuset: Support multiple destination " Waiman Long
2026-07-01 2:51 ` Ridong Chen
2026-07-01 21:16 ` Waiman Long
2026-06-30 3:33 ` [PATCH-next v9 11/11] selftests/cgroup: Add test for cpuset affinity on controller disable Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akPMKXppWM74-m9a@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox