From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: storage: uas: limit consecutive device resets in error handling
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 15:01:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akSsw_iDneYb_4gQ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <akSqd7HkrZI78_L_@google.com>
On (26/07/01 14:57), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (26/07/01 07:38), Greg KH wrote:
> > > +static int uas_reset_limit = 3;
>
> This obviously wanted to be 0 by default (just a side note).
>
> > > +module_param_named(reset_limit, uas_reset_limit, int, 0644);
> > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(reset_limit, "Maximum number of consecutive device resets during error handling before failing");
> >
> > This is not the 1990's, we do not add module parameters for issues that
> > should be properly solved either automatically, or on a per-device
> > basis.
> >
> > There's no way that ChromeOs wants to attempt to track this module
> > parameter as a bootline config option, right?
>
> Can you please elaborate on "properly solved either automatically,
> or on a per-device basis". I don't know how to break that endless
> reset loop otherwise. I'm open to any suggestions, the patch is RFC
> for a reason.
I can imagine uas_reset_limit being auto-calculated based on SCSI
timeout (30 seconds) and HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT (if set). Will that
work? I don't know if all those timeouts can be clearly exposed
to the UAS driver (or should they be in the first place).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 4:03 [RFC PATCH] usb: storage: uas: limit consecutive device resets in error handling Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-07-01 5:38 ` Greg KH
2026-07-01 5:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-07-01 6:01 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2026-07-01 8:28 ` [usb-storage] " Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akSsw_iDneYb_4gQ@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox