From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 248783CB2EF; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 11:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782991678; cv=none; b=k1nTH8IJeRLr6ReYn+MBQs6Ru366FN+6B6qcLC+MboQ7TSZiuOL3Yrc74S6HNCr8/lU8fw1mH1fsOa+QtMberYZ2gUdpKha/e5zHYWbslb8Lj9f+jxawMmVGo5CV7KKvcG65xVqbU8Wh0Gv1xUn+OLNVmhsMh10FuHLwrCnJqe0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782991678; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fM1g4x2BNT0I+p2uEA6GyQp5uAqaZy5LUt3RSXD/WvA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uNpEyx/GDJt+gF0D8JzDwfiIl4jtJm9aT2Uk9Cf9QY6HGmIfh6CCRLjLgkCf1NlKcIwyjl6SiBpelALK7TE4URWeCsbnwrCyA7ziouf2i9kGiWzvOt8Gd1L3fel8rrT/i5MKX88SgPwPbGrdbxUX1HpHV0uIa91g/tqc9V93tIg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=MrufhUSr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="MrufhUSr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=xZVlJRZf0uavPI96jC0PFQV0YrUSBkAByWeLeb7ZK8I=; b=MrufhUSrMzj4v8PiyeZwfWD2hs JWNM0PN+UZIKM+as+lGeV5dSDXsxWXYqnDug0ttQVDLtWFB1Vwa8GQ4NEx8VUvnJZ6VVrd7AkwKTF 7j32uGIz6jQSJcsXGH6Jli4wCre2P29E2IHDCLFxd0Qi/XBXmyaKBGDVo8y4ZvwF5LC30TIzrizfD A4IA4P+qZ0wVutOHjiBQp5hp7ZLfWBAFLMrIDzVRCyPPrzuqLlQPHa+TpFepXrGQSjbTgBXcJAv30 orQPb6u6rVidkRBtfS7WddlYmUQGijhEHc7YWvTv6hiz781DBpmDFQjVeUUOxqTGxg2mbf+FLY8ms AwRGYfkg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wfFaF-00000004Jhy-3Bjo; Thu, 02 Jul 2026 11:27:55 +0000 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 04:27:55 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christian Brauner Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jonathan Corbet , Jens Axboe , David Hildenbrand , Jeff Layton , Vlastimil Babka , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] coding-assistants: simplify attribution Message-ID: References: <20260701-work-coding-assistants-v1-1-a20a94d1d606@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260701-work-coding-assistants-v1-1-a20a94d1d606@kernel.org> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 05:54:48PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > Assisted-by: LLM > > or > > Assisted-by: Coding Assistant I think what is more relevant is what assistance there was. If the code was generated by an LLM we should plain out reject it out of copyright grounds. If it was used for validation or ideas: who care? I.e. do we need this at all except as a guard against vibe code junk that pull in other copyrighted material? And do we really rely on a tag instead of detecting it by the usual signs?