From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B771D39903E; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 16:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783615130; cv=none; b=Uav6SG7eYXQmNvNoP4blJezY5Rmi1xUTv/2aYIksCYdMxPObEIOhvTF8rN7QjpwoqpQO7LyMG0l2l67KRagPotfC/RPZYqOmggKFs07tjekW5P5l7XCGZnTyY97bv9VLKDsCpExZPGdUhdqW6Yh0uYEWU47ERbSAAsz8UhH5Jic= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783615130; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0a73eJQMiohbn6QT4pvZwY77RLnsVkKRtt4dG7DpzC8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ra/o9kwLEzcW+iY1Tb+gAMCJXMn3VplWOZseYIz+g5MGlkhcX1jCmGwuIxF4HXKSapztpbfYx3ma5RXPpcd0TpzrvQKcxhZGlih/l0cfmyBD4Gfv+yAm5e266pNjQWyX4aHzlMyySqKqLe48vG/tPqhbbgQ0aY6e5z6aDpdL8eI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=ZNznLYKV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="ZNznLYKV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=NuQTGH3+APiOn/6liz7yOWPh/Eu7AGICy8vOLDYKfsI=; b=ZNznLYKV/j20eFdnO8IiAVE8G1 YPmtO0+dN4iDKaVbC5V6bLMklXz0YTe5GzVUdvkF5uclXsGSma5UI5R23bzn0ROfzgFMafHqTXhV1 exHnzK+VXBqI/8NCQ8r9lVZO5rFIGv1cDZmrdxXq4BC1UiFA/wGKKv71uGYKbCA9orWAfwXSh63mX BzWNrAC6+r4qBWEags3k6/7Wa3FFgkwssLu7a+WKEIhnxwDS0AnQIkCLuPxlYek5yW2dMOq+4YlwK xfv+PAMf7HOlNPzTnvVGs21NgLxF13T+AQ7lyC2bVw1TL7kqd5YXB6yqALd77TTzIqon6ykNVwl0F pfUkTubA==; Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1whrli-003qTX-0B; Thu, 09 Jul 2026 16:38:34 +0000 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 09:38:28 -0700 From: Breno Leitao To: Paolo Abeni Cc: Simon Horman , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, asantostc@gmail.com, gustavold@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] netconsole: stop charging netpoll users for netconsole-only data Message-ID: References: <20260702-netconsole_move_more-v2-0-1ebedd921dcb@debian.org> <20260709101945.GN1364329@horms.kernel.org> <64257110-d9fe-42df-9990-2ec1421a7c29@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <64257110-d9fe-42df-9990-2ec1421a7c29@redhat.com> X-Debian-User: leitao On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 12:27:35PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On 7/9/26 12:19 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 04:55:35AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 05:19:44AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > >>> This work continue to untangle netconsole and netpoll, improving > >>> memory usage for netpoll users that are not netconsole. > >> > >> Quick follow up on the sashiko findings. most of them are assuming that > >> netconsole_write is called locklelly, which is not the case, except > >> on panic (CON_NBCON_ATOMIC_UNSAFE). > >> > >> > >> There are in order as they appear in > >> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260702-netconsole_move_more-v2-0-1ebedd921dcb%40debian.org > >> > >> Tl;DR: There are two pre-existing issue that I will get fixed, but > >> I don't think they are blockers for this series (IMO). > > > > Thanks, I agree. > > > > For the series: > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > > > > I did notice that patch 2/8 now applies with some fuzz, which trips up git am. > > You may want to consider a rebase. > > Yep, a rebase is needed, thanks! Ack, I will do! Thanks