From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 34/40] sched_ext: Authorize remote-move inserts against the placing scheduler
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 22:09:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak__5beR_STJ5OsU@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708212429.3405787-35-tj@kernel.org>
Hi Tejun,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 11:24:23AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> scx_local_or_reject_dsq() authorizes a local-DSQ insert against the caps
> of the scheduler doing the insert. On the consume/dispatch paths that is
> the scheduler running balance_one(), passed down through
> scx_consume_dispatch_q() and move_local_task_to_local_dsq(), so the check
> is correct.
>
> The remote-move path loses it. move_remote_task_to_local_dsq()
> re-activates @p on the destination rq through enqueue_task_scx(), which
> reconstructs the scheduler from the task, i.e. @p's owner. When an
> ancestor places a descendant's task - e.g. draining a bypassed
> sub-scheduler - the owner is a sub-scheduler of the placer, so
> authorizing against the owner checks a narrower cap set and can
> spuriously reject a task the placer is entitled to run.
>
> Carry the placing scheduler across the activate_task() boundary the same
> way enq_flags already are, via a per-rq field set only for the duration
> of the re-activation, and have scx_local_or_reject_dsq() authorize
> against it. The placer's caps are a superset of the owner's, so this
> admits what the placer may run and keeps rejecting what it may not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> kernel/sched/ext/sub.c | 9 +++++++--
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> index e15297c29617..896f8f9eea6f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> @@ -2256,7 +2256,8 @@ static void move_local_task_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch,
> *
> * Move @p which is currently on @src_rq to @dst_rq's local DSQ.
> */
> -static void move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
> +static void move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch,
> + struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
> struct rq *src_rq, struct rq *dst_rq)
nit: since the function gained the new @sch parameter, maybe add
"@sch: scx_sched being operated on" to the kernel-doc block.
Thanks,
-Andrea
> {
> lockdep_assert_rq_held(src_rq);
> @@ -2273,15 +2274,19 @@ static void move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
> raw_spin_rq_lock(dst_rq);
>
> /*
> - * We want to pass scx-specific enq_flags but activate_task() will
> - * truncate the upper 32 bit. As we own @rq, we can pass them through
> - * @rq->scx.remote_activate_enq_flags instead.
> + * activate_task() below truncates enq_flags to 32 bits and re-derives
> + * @p's owner, dropping our scx flags and the placing @sch. We own @rq,
> + * so stash both across the call. The enqueue reads them back, keeping
> + * the scx flags and checking caps against the placer, not the owner.
> */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_of(dst_rq), p->cpus_ptr));
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(dst_rq->scx.remote_activate_enq_flags);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(dst_rq->scx.remote_activate_enq_flags ||
> + dst_rq->scx.remote_activate_sch);
> dst_rq->scx.remote_activate_enq_flags = enq_flags;
> + dst_rq->scx.remote_activate_sch = sch;
> activate_task(dst_rq, p, 0);
> dst_rq->scx.remote_activate_enq_flags = 0;
> + dst_rq->scx.remote_activate_sch = NULL;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2410,14 +2415,14 @@ static bool unlink_dsq_and_lock_src_rq(struct task_struct *p,
> !WARN_ON_ONCE(src_rq != task_rq(p));
> }
>
> -static bool consume_remote_task(struct rq *this_rq,
> +static bool consume_remote_task(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *this_rq,
> struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
> struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct rq *src_rq)
> {
> raw_spin_rq_unlock(this_rq);
>
> if (unlink_dsq_and_lock_src_rq(p, dsq, src_rq)) {
> - move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(p, enq_flags, src_rq, this_rq);
> + move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(sch, p, enq_flags, src_rq, this_rq);
> return true;
> } else {
> raw_spin_rq_unlock(src_rq);
> @@ -2479,8 +2484,7 @@ static struct rq *move_task_between_dsqs(struct scx_sched *sch,
> raw_spin_unlock(&src_dsq->lock);
> } else {
> raw_spin_unlock(&src_dsq->lock);
> - move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(p, enq_flags,
> - src_rq, dst_rq);
> + move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(sch, p, enq_flags, src_rq, dst_rq);
> }
> } else {
> /*
> @@ -2533,7 +2537,7 @@ bool scx_consume_dispatch_q(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
> }
>
> if (task_can_run_on_remote_rq(sch, p, rq, false)) {
> - if (likely(consume_remote_task(rq, p, enq_flags, dsq, task_rq)))
> + if (likely(consume_remote_task(sch, rq, p, enq_flags, dsq, task_rq)))
> return true;
> goto retry;
> }
> @@ -2627,8 +2631,7 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
> scx_dispatch_enqueue(sch, src_rq, find_global_dsq(sch, task_cpu(p)),
> p, enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_GDSQ_FALLBACK);
> } else {
> - move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(p, enq_flags,
> - src_rq, dst_rq);
> + move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(sch, p, enq_flags, src_rq, dst_rq);
> /* task has been moved to dst_rq, which is now locked */
> locked_rq = dst_rq;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c b/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
> index 9a1eac886928..f66e97f08ce6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
> @@ -237,12 +237,17 @@ struct scx_dispatch_q *scx_local_or_reject_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq
> struct task_struct *p, u64 *enq_flags)
> {
> s32 cid = __scx_cpu_to_cid(cpu_of(rq));
> + struct scx_sched *asch = rq->scx.remote_activate_sch ?: sch;
> u64 needed = scx_caps_for_enq(*enq_flags);
> u64 missing;
>
> + /*
> + * On a remote activation the scheduling sched (@asch) differs from
> + * @p's owner (@sch). Check caps against the scheduling sched.
> + */
> if (*enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_PREEMPT)
> - needed |= scx_caps_for_preempt(sch, rq);
> - missing = scx_missing_caps(sch, cpu_of(rq), needed);
> + needed |= scx_caps_for_preempt(asch, rq);
> + missing = scx_missing_caps(asch, cpu_of(rq), needed);
>
> /* requirements met */
> if (likely(!missing))
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index c0a4699a6c0a..cdd21c814008 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -800,8 +800,9 @@ struct scx_rq {
> struct list_head runnable_list; /* runnable tasks on this rq */
> struct list_head ddsp_deferred_locals; /* deferred ddsps from enq */
> unsigned long ops_qseq;
> - /* see move_remote_task_to_local_dsq() */
> + /* both stashed across the activate_task() in move_remote_task_to_local_dsq() */
> u64 remote_activate_enq_flags;
> + struct scx_sched *remote_activate_sch;
> u32 nr_running;
> u32 cpuperf_target; /* [0, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE] */
> bool in_select_cpu;
> --
> 2.54.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 21:23 [PATCHSET v4 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched_ext: Capability-based CPU delegation for sub-schedulers Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 01/40] sched_ext: Record an error on errno-only sub-enable failure Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 20:37 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 02/40] sched_ext: Fix premature ops->priv publication in scx_alloc_and_add_sched() Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 20:38 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 03/40] tools/sched_ext: scx - Fix cmask_subset(), cmask_equal() and cmask_weight() Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 20:39 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 04/40] sched_ext: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE in cmask word ops and drop _RACY variants Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 20:39 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 05/40] sched_ext: Add SCX_CALL_CID_OP_TASK() for cid-form op dispatch Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 20:41 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 06/40] sched_ext: Rename extra_enq_flags to remote_activate_enq_flags Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 20:41 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 07/40] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap - Use bare u64/u32/s32 integer types Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 20:42 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 08/40] sched_ext: Reject direct slice and dsq_vtime writes for cid-form schedulers Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 20:56 ` Andrea Righi
[not found] ` <20260708214121.ABDD61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 09/40] sched_ext: Make scx_bpf_kick_cid() return void Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 20:57 ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 10/40] sched_ext: Make the kick machinery per-sched Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 11/40] sched_ext: Add ops.init_cids() to finalize the cid layout before init Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708215432.0DAD01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 12/40] sched_ext: Add CID sharding Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 13/40] sched_ext: Add shard boundaries to scx_bpf_cid_override() Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708214738.7A1811F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 14/40] sched_ext: Defer scx_sched kobj sysfs add into the enable workfns Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708214720.193391F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 15/40] sched_ext: Add per-shard scx_sched storage scaffolding Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708214419.34D441F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 16/40] sched_ext: Add scx_cmask_ref for validated arena cmask access Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 17/40] sched_ext: Build the set_cmask scratch from trusted geometry Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 18/40] sched_ext: RCU-protect the sub-sched tree's children/sibling lists Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 19/40] sched_ext: Add scx_skip_subtree_pre() Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 20/40] sched_ext: Stop resolving a disabled scheduler's programs Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708215520.8C5461F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 21/40] sched_ext: Add per-shard cap delegation for sub-schedulers Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708220057.20F581F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 22/40] sched_ext: Add coalescing sub_caps_updated() notifier " Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 23/40] sched_ext: Maintain per-cpu effective cap copies for single-read checks Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708220327.7BA8B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 24/40] sched_ext: Add sub_ecaps_updated() effective-cap change notifier Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708220220.87C181F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 25/40] sched_ext: Generalize local-DSQ handling to rq-owned DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 26/40] sched_ext: Add reject DSQ for cap-rejected dispatches Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 27/40] sched_ext: Add the SCX_CAP_ENQ_IMMED cap Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708215657.DDB5E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 28/40] sched_ext: Assign a unique id to each scheduler instance Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 29/40] sched_ext: Route task slice writes through set_task_slice() Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708215333.747381F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 30/40] sched_ext: Track the cpu a task is runnable on Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 31/40] sched_ext: Tie cpu occupancy to SCX_CAP_BASE through the task slice Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 32/40] sched_ext: Add the SCX_CAP_ENQ cap Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708220009.E27C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 33/40] sched_ext: Gate kicks on SCX_CAP_BASE and preemption on SCX_CAP_PREEMPT Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 34/40] sched_ext: Authorize remote-move inserts against the placing scheduler Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 20:09 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
[not found] ` <20260708220444.DDA121F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 35/40] sched_ext: Route ops.update_idle() to sub-schedulers and re-notify owed scheds Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 36/40] sched_ext: Replay ecaps notifications suppressed by bypass Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 37/40] sched_ext: Add scx_bpf_sub_kill() to evict a child sub-scheduler Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708221110.ED3521F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 38/40] tools/sched_ext: Add three-mask cmask intersection iterator Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 39/40] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap - Expand hierarchical sub-scheduling Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20260708220353.392CD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-07-09 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH v4 sched_ext/for-7.3 40/40] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap - Add sub-sched cap fault injection Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 21:18 ` [PATCHSET v4 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched_ext: Capability-based CPU delegation for sub-schedulers Tejun Heo
2026-07-09 22:13 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak__5beR_STJ5OsU@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox