From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Sort registers in cpu-feature-registers.rst
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:22:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akaCJvZkdqigcQUZ@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522-arm64-cpu-ftr-regs-v1-3-19775b40faf0@kernel.org>
On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 06:58:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> - ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 - Processor Feature Register 0
> + ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 - Instruction set attribute register 1
>
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> | Name | bits | visible |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> - | DIT | [51-48] | y |
> + | LS64 | [63-60] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> - | MPAM | [43-40] | n |
> + | I8MM | [55-52] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> - | SVE | [35-32] | y |
> + | DGH | [51-48] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> - | GIC | [27-24] | n |
> + | BF16 | [47-44] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> - | AdvSIMD | [23-20] | y |
> + | SB | [39-36] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> - | FP | [19-16] | y |
> + | FRINTTS | [35-32] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> - | EL3 | [15-12] | n |
> + | GPI | [31-28] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> - | EL2 | [11-8] | n |
> + | GPA | [27-24] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> - | EL1 | [7-4] | n |
> + | LRCPC | [23-20] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> - | EL0 | [3-0] | n |
> + | FCMA | [19-16] | y |
> + +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> + | JSCVT | [15-12] | y |
> + +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> + | API | [11-8] | y |
> + +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> + | APA | [7-4] | y |
> + +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> + | DPB | [3-0] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
The patch is fine but I just realised that we are really inconsistent
with the non-visible things. We exposed a few hear, I guess in the early
days, and then we stopped, just adding the occasional visible fields.
Shall we drop the 'visible' column altogether and only document the
visible fields here?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 17:58 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: Fixes and cleanups for cpu-feature-registers.rst Mark Brown
2026-05-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: Don't number registers in cpu-feature-registers.rst Mark Brown
2026-05-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Document missing bitfields " Mark Brown
2026-07-02 15:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-05-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Sort registers " Mark Brown
2026-07-02 15:22 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2026-07-02 15:38 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akaCJvZkdqigcQUZ@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox