From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Mert Seftali <mertsftl@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Jelle van der Waa" <jelle@vdwaa.nl>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: dmard09: Implement IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 16:30:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ake5YH7GsGFnkSPm@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703130750.66549-1-mertseftali@web.de>
On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 03:07:50PM +0200, Mert Seftali wrote:
> in_accel_scale has returned -EINVAL ever since the driver was added.
You mean "Reading the in_accel_scale attribute ends up in returning..." ?
> The channels advertise scale via info_mask_shared_by_type, so the IIO
> core exposes in_accel_scale, but dmard09_read_raw() only handles
> IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW;
> a SCALE read falls through to 'default: return
> -EINVAL':
This part is repetition of the first paragraph. Drop one of them.
> $ cat .../iio:deviceX/in_accel_scale
> cat: in_accel_scale: Invalid argument
>
> leaving userspace with raw counts it cannot convert to m/s^2.
>
> The driver was written from a vendor source [1] without a datasheet, and
> the scale was declared but never implemented. The vendor source carries
> the sensitivity: its conversion is
>
> acc = raw * GRAVITY_EARTH_1000 / sensitivity (then / 1000 -> m/s^2)
>
> with sensitivity = 32 and GRAVITY_EARTH_1000 = 9807 ("about
> (9.80665)*1000"), i.e. 32 counts correspond to 1 g.
>
> That sensitivity applies to the value this driver already reports as raw.
> The vendor processes each 16-bit sample as 'data >>= 3; data &= 0x1ff'
Try to write it more human and less programmish. Something like
"...16-bit sample as a signed 9-bit..." In other words, drop those technical
details, people can check the code by the link.
> plus a sign-extend of bit 8 - a signed 9-bit quantity from register bits
> [11:3] - and dmard09_read_raw()'s 'accel <<= 4; accel >>= 7' yields the
"...and in dmard09_read_raw() preparation yields the..."
> same value. It is self-consistent: 256 counts / 32 = 8 g full scale,
> matching the part's +/-8g range.
>
> Implement the scale derived from that sensitivity using standard gravity:
>
> scale = 9.80665 / 32 = 0.3064578125 m/s^2 per LSB
> [1] https://github.com/minstrelsy/mediatek/blob/1f49d8c87b839651bc89afc870277e8e0f2e2d55/custom/common/kernel/accelerometer/dmard09/dmard09.c
>
Make this a Link tag
Link: $URL [1]
> Fixes: a4fa6509dda4 ("iio: accel: add support for the Domintech DMARD09 3-axis accelerometer")
> Signed-off-by: Mert Seftali <mertsftl@gmail.com>
...
> +/* Sensitivity is 32 LSB/g; scale = 9.80665 / 32 m/s^2 per LSB. */
> +#define DMARD09_SCALE_NANO 306457813
I'm not sure how it's derived. Can we use more of calculations here instead of
precalculated value?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 13:07 [PATCH] iio: accel: dmard09: Implement IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE Mert Seftali
2026-07-03 13:30 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-07-03 13:32 ` Joshua Crofts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ake5YH7GsGFnkSPm@ashevche-desk.local \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jelle@vdwaa.nl \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mertsftl@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox