From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Renzo Davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>,
Davide Berardi <berardi.dav@gmail.com>,
strace-devel@lists.strace.io, "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@strace.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ptrace: add PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_FLAG_SET_IP
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 13:04:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akeXWxiS0GcW1Hh0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703105027.539399-5-renzo@cs.unibo.it>
On 07/03, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>
> This flag adds support for modifying the tracee's instruction pointer.
>
> To do this, the tracer stores the new instruction pointer value in the
> instruction_pointer field of the ptrace_syscall_info structure and
> sets the PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_FLAG_SET_IP flag in the flags field.
But why? Who will use this feature and for what? How often?
I think the changelog should be more convincing...
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 10:50 [PATCH v2 0/5] ptrace_set_syscall_info: add support for seccomp syscall skipping and instruction pointer modification Renzo Davoli
2026-07-03 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ptrace: PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO syscall skipping support Renzo Davoli
2026-07-03 10:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-03 11:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-03 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] selftests/ptrace: add a test case for PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO syscall skipping Renzo Davoli
2026-07-03 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] asm/ptrace.h: add instruction_pointer_set Renzo Davoli
2026-07-03 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ptrace: add PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_FLAG_SET_IP Renzo Davoli
2026-07-03 11:04 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-07-03 15:01 ` Renzo Davoli
2026-07-03 15:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-07-03 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] selftests/ptrace: add a test case for PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_FLAG_SET_IP Renzo Davoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akeXWxiS0GcW1Hh0@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=berardi.dav@gmail.com \
--cc=evgsyr@gmail.com \
--cc=ldv@strace.io \
--cc=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=renzo@cs.unibo.it \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=strace-devel@lists.strace.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox