From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from submarine.notk.org (submarine.notk.org [62.210.214.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA3043E0C5F; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 14:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783088244; cv=none; b=JfPjEoCmXzDUfVC+rHKkz7juC6WGSbhSFgS5AEo0mK6E7/mI2rlSDkAAKnUOAkfHJm+HdZLJeMdX9Qfgi3mkuFhXNSUw17Qy+8BsTHRE/iilFsXxwnXGloPI8LYGP7A3tawVKyQv7388rgGp//X3VeXRGJaF5akNWZTNXMEXTHY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783088244; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RyoUpzyXE/7znmuPerg2ja01YbdFuIXsPb1n9JsGwE8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eguqcNMOfsQ0qTx5xSyR475SbYfz1jdTcc1OadtUuMNezMilkKZgBABmiiLmcqqMj1hrCmfTZ7ZqFTGtHaNqVU1OpFi++pTNiPgX2E3YQOn23RW1HRbGogFQuf/ZubpiMTLr+nBBJDqo6wKTyz0J7rO4/QcjbBG2+jZzbBGBPJo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b=vi+e17oX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b="vi+e17oX" Received: from gaia.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submarine.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4412614C2DE; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 16:17:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1783088237; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h0/G1RbQfTBkk4DxEYT0JUXdIjg59u9DH5wVt7CJFkc=; b=vi+e17oXEyM0Wq0B0T3TNhe2ReIP5YxlFV29e+FvwJbeniYoVSVyug2eSxq684gkryTsnj HOLunvTP/CHHnOyFKiaseNsLBerLXNS4zrFj/gTGtkxLpCSNLuT+55QYxK7HtPHuIZjOsc oybt/5YIVJvkBnkLEVwkGCPYd7+iqkRJ/fWbPcqEt4UGJlUWFj6C8HEuMivIPLncisbLON Ssg+JFLWNZcK/4lmaamMVGZERo1giNSUWWBh6KXtCOjAEisnJQAG7arLhE/4K56rJLJmcu B5NCBz0EQIOM6IT5VMoE3uw4NOPHm3LXX+ffCLifTImO0iu9fSC4BjWal2gE6w== Received: from localhost (gaia.codewreck.org [local]) by gaia.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id ac786db3; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 14:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 23:16:58 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev, Latchesar Ionkov , Eric Sandeen , Christian Schoenebeck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Van Hensbergen , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix privport option setting wrong RDMA field Message-ID: References: <20260703102254.114446-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260703102254.114446-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> Stefano Garzarella wrote on Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 12:22:54PM +0200: > From: Stefano Garzarella > > While reviewing a patch adding vsock transport to 9p, I noticed that > since commit 1f3e4142c0eb ("9p: convert to the new mount API"), the > Opt_privport case incorrectly sets rdma_opts->port instead of > rdma_opts->privport, so mounting with the privport option overwrites > the RDMA port number instead of enabling privileged port usage. > > Fixes: 1f3e4142c0eb ("9p: convert to the new mount API") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Cc: sandeen@redhat.com > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella Thanks, this is obviously correct so picking it up. -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus