From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"DRM XE List" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Violet Monti <violet.monti@intel.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-xe tree with the drm-fixes tree
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 16:44:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akfYxPrDcKSXabSu@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2639 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-xe tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_whitelist.c
between commit:
959b5016e4646 ("drm/xe/oa: Fix offset alignment for MERT WHITELIST_OA_MERT_MMIO_TRG")
from the drm-fixes tree and commits:
5ff004fdc7377 ("drm/xe/rtp: Add struct types for RTP tables")
90511bdcfda97 ("drm/xe/rtp: Add RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_DENY to OA whitelists")
c478244a9e2d1 ("drm/xe/rtp: Maintain OA whitelists separately")
15739920b71ef ("drm/xe/rtp: Keep track of non-OA nonpriv slots")
c3ff77d7235cc ("drm/xe/rtp: Generalize whitelist_apply_to_hwe")
3a3c3e56db292 ("drm/xe/rtp: Save OA nonpriv registers to register save/restore lists")
aeaa7d2bb0172 ("drm/xe/rtp: Toggle 'deny' bit to (de-)whitelist OA regs")
6f73bf8fffa72 ("drm/xe/rtp: (De-)whitelist OA registers for all hwe's for a gt")
645f1a2589bd4 ("drm/xe/rtp: Ensure locking/ref counting for OA whitelists")
483c9f5451592 ("drm/xe/tests/rtp: Add kunit test for whitelist upper bounds")
f6c23e4589bdc ("drm/xe/oa: Fix offset alignment for MERT WHITELIST_OA_MERT_MMIO_TRG")
from the drm-xe tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --combined drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_whitelist.c
index 526907d2d8246,cab1b578ca0ef..0000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_whitelist.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_whitelist.c
@@@ -5,6 -5,8 +5,8 @@@
#include "xe_reg_whitelist.h"
+ #include <kunit/visibility.h>
+
#include "regs/xe_engine_regs.h"
#include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
#include "regs/xe_oa_regs.h"
@@@ -41,7 -43,7 +43,7 @@@ static bool match_multi_queue_class(con
return xe_gt_supports_multi_queue(gt, hwe->class);
}
- static const struct xe_rtp_table_sr register_whitelist = XE_RTP_TABLE_SR(
+ VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT const struct xe_rtp_table_sr register_whitelist = XE_RTP_TABLE_SR(
{ XE_RTP_NAME("WaAllowPMDepthAndInvocationCountAccessFromUMD, 1408556865"),
XE_RTP_RULES(GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1200, 1210), ENGINE_CLASS(RENDER)),
XE_RTP_ACTIONS(WHITELIST(PS_INVOCATION_COUNT,
@@@ -104,6 -106,7 +106,7 @@@
RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ACCESS_RW))
},
);
+ EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(register_whitelist);
static const struct xe_rtp_table_sr oa_whitelist = XE_RTP_TABLE_SR(
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 15:44 Mark Brown [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-03 16:20 linux-next: manual merge of the drm-xe tree with the drm-fixes tree Mark Brown
2026-07-03 15:44 Mark Brown
2026-07-03 15:41 Mark Brown
2026-07-03 15:41 Mark Brown
2026-01-30 16:05 Mark Brown
2026-01-23 15:34 Mark Brown
2025-09-19 12:49 Mark Brown
2025-09-19 12:45 Mark Brown
2025-09-22 18:28 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-22 19:25 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-12-06 12:55 Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akfYxPrDcKSXabSu@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=violet.monti@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox