From: Horst Birthelmer <horst@birthelmer.de>
To: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: don't bump attr_version for async direct read completion
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 10:38:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aktpOW1LWNkn-jlE@fedora.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706082931.99288-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 04:29:31PM +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> The attr_version counter should only be incremented when cached
> attributes are actually modified (as documented in commit 1fb69e781729
> ("fuse: fix race between getattr and write")). Async direct reads do not
> modify any cached inode attributes (size, mtime, ctime), so bumping
> attr_version in fuse_aio_complete() for reads is incorrect.
>
> This unconditional bump causes a livelock when auto_inval_data is
> enabled together with writeback_cache: fuse_cache_read_iter() issues a
> FUSE_GETATTR before every read, but by the time the response arrives,
> an async DIO read completion has already incremented fi->attr_version
> past the snapshot taken before the request. The GETATTR result is then
> discarded (attr_version race), fi->i_time is never refreshed, and every
> subsequent read triggers yet another GETATTR -- creating an infinite
> loop of useless round-trips.
>
> Fix this by only bumping attr_version for write completions, consistent
> with the synchronous DIO write path (fuse_write_update_attr) and the
> cached write path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/fuse/file.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index ceada75310b8..c41287e8bc15 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static void fuse_aio_complete(struct fuse_io_priv *io, int err, ssize_t pos)
> struct address_space *mapping = io->iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping;
> ssize_t res = fuse_get_res_by_io(io);
>
> - if (res >= 0) {
> + if (res >= 0 && io->write) {
> struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
> struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
>
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
>
>
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Horst Birthelmer <hbirthelmer@ddn.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 8:29 [PATCH] fuse: don't bump attr_version for async direct read completion Jingbo Xu
2026-07-06 8:38 ` Horst Birthelmer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aktpOW1LWNkn-jlE@fedora.fritz.box \
--to=horst@birthelmer.de \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox