Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] riscv, bpf: Remove BPF exceptions from BPF CI denylist

[Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 11:00:07AM -0700, Björn Töpel wrote:
> Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > This patch removes BPF exceptions from riscv64 denylist on
> > BPF selftests since support for exceptions has been added now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64 | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64
> > index 4fc4dfdde293..9268351ce4c1 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64
> > @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
> >  # riscv64 deny list for BPF CI and local vmtest
> > -exceptions					# JIT does not support exceptions
> 
> Hmm, reading your cover the kselftest run still says "#113
> exceptions:FAIL", so from a CI perspective this is not much help. ;-)
> Can we restructure/split so that we're not bitten by the lack of
> BPF-to-BPF calls and tail calls?

Yeah, that was pretty foolish of me. My next version won't include a
denylist change, but if [1] lands, then we won't have to
worry about this anymore!

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/bf647816-d292-419c-b79f-fc048122aebc@huaweicloud.com

> 
> Thanks,
> Björn