From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.secunet.com (mx1.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0753C39FCD8; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 06:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783405953; cv=none; b=m+DuUx6GzSGS4KdLLXA9ZaGFqahoZa9ZfAz6zwBNR9ThsJbKklEX18ke1Mi2O2pY4pb1VL/3TtlXnK5Sby6T5wTMqX8yNnrUdZg29hP49mn/GMGIDOVEeoLydQUXxchUcZyKSBe/Gc6I0gz93XiOly5h6HNAzYVlPneopI/iRSE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783405953; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zmEEoVghLmkXah8DON/RC3BV8nG8xs7yHSuN0CqZKiE=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Zc0+jk4sAXOAby9Z6a79yVCrh+Qtn6xCPiRoSNwSsldIL5VQRD/2QsstAKp2jjk8OH2jQmZ0kQHoLThXQYsevbIuX2HYyxrovUfJVOHrJbJ3gZM5JKF09F4DHCulLR97JUYEu3XfVpuelQL0JVuzLdQUtCs9XjtdRDQ0ayRTGpE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com header.i=@secunet.com header.b=eikZaHj7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com header.i=@secunet.com header.b="eikZaHj7" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9221920684; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:32:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from mx1.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uqLy8jOnu6_F; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:32:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EXCH-01.secunet.de (rl1.secunet.de [10.32.0.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141E6201A7; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:32:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.secunet.com 141E6201A7 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secunet.com; s=202301; t=1783405943; bh=wWkuBF+/NnugGBdkdGrXTQ8g30ZR2qmwIVTaDD3O8LE=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eikZaHj7bDAkItp3a4U/CWsTwpBtrcvTh17OOkBiIHV7pmr1KyKcsW7ZXAN3tH1Js +9V+LrhNohB5l7mokijTaQ/vEh0orZSvl5UYXqEBGkxK+BMz63MoiA34DEllXdLRUZ lW0eBGb0m8QJ2ZtuPp9VzgeYBOHG1xSvVOVPWPS6f0a4xHX5kACzMECbLmICahqsfF zlYP8k5OEiutPlbYKgOW3X7MuD2WggiRuw+fBewlrJEbQIorNBSb3kA/49e4ZhS+4C cbat1oZfTBEK7Ne0JFNhn77SaJeL6NdKh7ZWuS8zXZwkh1aO5uPTRlTA+GD46LPFi6 e5RSYU6iarINg== Received: from secunet.com (10.182.7.193) by EXCH-01.secunet.de (10.32.0.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.37; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:32:22 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 203123 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 07 Jul 2026 06:32:21 -0000 Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:32:21 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: Cen Zhang CC: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Christian Hopps , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: clear mode callbacks after failed mode setup Message-ID: References: <20260627030117.2614741-1-zzzccc427@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCH-01.secunet.de (10.32.0.171) To EXCH-01.secunet.de (10.32.0.171) On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 10:32:13AM +0800, Cen Zhang wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the noise, but I wanted to gently follow up on this patch in > case it got buried. > > I would really appreciate any feedback when you have a chance. Please > let me know if I should make any changes or provide more testing > results. It is not forgotten, I had it in my testing branch until now. This is now applied to the ipsec tree, thanks a lot!