The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: replace __get_free_pages() with kmalloc()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:43:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <al4YBTQ-aUS9_DJJ@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260704-b4-scsi-v2-0-7d2d21a810de@kernel.org>

Gentle ping.

On Sat, Jul 04, 2026 at 09:13:33AM +0300, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote:
> This is a (small) part of larger work of replacing page allocator calls
> with kmalloc.
> 
> My initial intention a few month ago was to remove ugly casts [1], but then
> willy pointed out that Linus objected to something like this [2] and it
> looks like more than a decade old technical debt.
> 
> Largely, anything that doesn't need struct page (or a memdesc in the
> future) should just use kmalloc() or kvmalloc() to allocate memory.
> kmalloc() guarantees alignment, physical contiguity and working
> virt_to_phys() and beside nicer API that returns void * on alloc and
> doesn't require to know the allocation size on free, kmalloc() provides
> better debugging capabilities than page allocator.
> 
> Another thing is that touching these allocation sites gives the reviewers
> opportunity to see if a PAGE_SIZE buffer is actually needed or maybe
> another size is appropriate.
> 
> For larger allocations that don't need physically contiguous memory
> kvmalloc() can be a better option that __get_free_pages() because under
> memory pressure it's is easier to allocate several order-0 pages than a
> physically contiguous chunk with the same number of pages.
> 
> And last, but not least, removing needless calls to page allocator should
> help with memdesc (aka project folio) conversion. There will be way less
> places to audit to see if the user was actually using struct page.
> 
> Also in git:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git gfp-to-kmalloc/scsi
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251018093002.3660549-1-rppt@kernel.org/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+55aFwp4iy4rtX2gE2WjBGFL=NxMVnoFeHqYa2j1dYOMMGqxg@mail.gmail.com/ 
> 
> ---
> v2 changes:
> * replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_NOIO in ipr driver
> 
> v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260630-b4-scsi-v1-0-494fb37ebe7b@kernel.org
> 
> ---
> Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) (4):
>       scsi: target: file: use kmalloc() to allocate temporary protection buffer
>       scsi: proc: use kmalloc() in proc writers
>       scsi: ipr: use kmalloc() to allocate IPR dump buffer memory
>       scsi: sym53c8xx_2: replace __get_free_pages() with kmalloc()
> 
>  drivers/scsi/ipr.c                  | 4 ++--
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c         | 5 +++--
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_proc.c            | 9 +++++----
>  drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.h | 4 ++--
>  drivers/target/target_core_file.c   | 4 ++--
>  5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: dc59e4fea9d83f03bad6bddf3fa2e52491777482
> change-id: 20260611-b4-scsi-d0b0eb4895f4
> 
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-04  6:13 [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: replace __get_free_pages() with kmalloc() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-04  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] scsi: target: file: use kmalloc() to allocate temporary protection buffer Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-04  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: proc: use kmalloc() in proc writers Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-04  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] scsi: ipr: use kmalloc() to allocate IPR dump buffer memory Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-04  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] scsi: sym53c8xx_2: replace __get_free_pages() with kmalloc() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-20 12:43 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=al4YBTQ-aUS9_DJJ@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hare@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wenxiong@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox