From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: SEV: Verify unsupported VM types are rejected at creation
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 13:21:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alACsZ41RLIbBzfM@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709174955.628913-2-hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 09, 2026, Hemanth Selam wrote:
> @@ -73,19 +74,34 @@ static void test_init2_invalid(unsigned long vm_type, struct kvm_sev_init *init,
> kvm_vm_free(vm);
> }
>
> +static void test_create_invalid_type(unsigned long vm_type, const char *msg)
> +{
> + int fd = __kvm_ioctl(kvm_fd, KVM_CREATE_VM, (void *)vm_type);
> + int err = errno;
> +
> + /* Clean up before asserting; TEST_ASSERT() aborts on failure. */
Literally every test relies on the kernel to clean up fds on an early exit. I
see no reason for this to behave differently.
Also, Sashiko was wrong. If KVM_CREATE_VM fails with something other than EINVAL,
the assert will NOT fire, but fd will be < 0.
> + if (fd >= 0)
> + close(fd);
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT(fd < 0 && err == EINVAL,
> + "KVM_CREATE_VM should reject unsupported type (%s), got fd=%d errno=%d",
> + msg, fd, err);
test_assert logs the errno, no need to spit it out here as well.
> +}
> +
> void test_vm_types(void)
> {
> test_init2(KVM_X86_SEV_VM, &(struct kvm_sev_init){});
>
> - /*
> - * TODO: check that unsupported types cannot be created. Probably
> - * a separate selftest.
Heh, I agree with the comment: put this in a separate selftest. This doesn't
have anything to do with KVM_SEV_INIT2, and in fact doesn't even have anyting to
do with SEV+ or even x86. E.g. add a kvm_vm_types_test that attempts to create
all possible VM types, and asserts success/failure based on the output from
kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 16:47 [PATCH v1 0/2] KVM: selftests: SEV: address two TODOs in the SEV tests Hemanth Selam
2026-07-09 16:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: selftests: SEV: Verify unsupported VM types are rejected at creation Hemanth Selam
2026-07-09 16:47 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: selftests: SEV: Sanity check the launch measurement Hemanth Selam
2026-07-09 17:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftests: SEV: address two TODOs in the SEV tests Hemanth Selam
2026-07-09 17:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: SEV: Verify unsupported VM types are rejected at creation Hemanth Selam
2026-07-09 20:21 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-07-10 5:06 ` Hemanth Selam
2026-07-09 17:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: SEV: Sanity check the launch measurement Hemanth Selam
2026-07-10 5:04 ` [PATCH v3] KVM: selftests: Add a test for KVM_CREATE_VM VM type enforcement Hemanth Selam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alACsZ41RLIbBzfM@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=hemanth.selam@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox