From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f42.google.com (mail-qv1-f42.google.com [209.85.219.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6503C35203E for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783696943; cv=none; b=ajs2LArEHXydzSQBNtBLTBps71Mf24OVdq+KqPQlNR9K8xyAuJ2LKwDHzkNQcVhIhwoI3z1KiO+HS9PQCTTHGtwRdwyJAYo3bFnGyo4c5MV2NCWS5KMn6gBTrPeA9XNE50MulvHJccVNZPljkMEUjrIW41dGdND9lnyuRj+KLds= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783696943; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mopxrwpdkIb+I3G7IhaOPyxUECZRBM3iFUXJGiR/KII=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VWdO08eOtuYNydm9PEakGqTJCVGyrOcHW4vydsk/SbRn4cXf1jyPXzyLQ8YXEIe31REUbRNPBYxZFz1euSqys/SJ4OzsDq9w0qSd8Nxh/RbP10l7C9Zmqv1VCVwA7Oh/0OqBt/5pZLS/pMOD8YQO7IOVv6IjJJFBRpiuEa20TeQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cmpxchg.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cmpxchg.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cmpxchg.org header.i=@cmpxchg.org header.b=D2w+2ttP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cmpxchg.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cmpxchg.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cmpxchg.org header.i=@cmpxchg.org header.b="D2w+2ttP" Received: by mail-qv1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8ee43b3e5abso7089716d6.3 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:22:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cmpxchg.org; s=google; t=1783696938; x=1784301738; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=LslWkPhTduHsnfKJmg6Amsj5C5OwSASqPOJLzZ77NKQ=; b=D2w+2ttPaTvDJSNx0PEYfm081RqLBJFCZ8oCl8kU6SEoAoEUM8RUrXWMkEh1w1VZIa n7V6cdybO9xY/nKNTiFwPNQERnh12aftMh2JNI/lDaApWQSkcYVlt5zA7lr31m9LOzG5 qfyaLWh4m4AHixrcHiCJQrLIljcFyHZrc+DYrK5buGCJRPDesc9BeKQbfb9nTeK/aFKq rnkRghelD7S3CoZunwww6vPdvefy4pJnNYePQ44hVufBkbNQ/dKWLct3TyJT2kREc4Gx iVOSI1itWWQkftyC4/Bat8HPbDMULq1ASZDQ2yRFlqgIXiFKe/hc+YZehyXIe4Q5VZFV AM6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1783696938; x=1784301738; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=LslWkPhTduHsnfKJmg6Amsj5C5OwSASqPOJLzZ77NKQ=; b=XBThu0z43PySsbZROUmgx6IWnsxEOzdYzGC2dDcqEAn1l3k/r+0pgZnA0cwDYgyK7m VrNm75FYgW0jrHIB1nU0u6t+Ov+rCJeIUCsNf/iWEnCRdDQlc89pAiIOv1gn2AL48xzV CNlXqbg1WumdUiZhEAwD0x9n7cQIDzgrzTzjwgsZ9lZvIuRO6iuipMk99hzXkJ+R8cXp 7WvFiQt0Izxhg6R5lSfSaoZvnbfwXTShPsVYuzQyAdVk0228RW8V1wzRPACst7OUVmei fPcUle7c4MC0UzsbOtIsaeo47/fEcYV3+i8U85t8PADSXYcIbsU52zenakMAXv62hi8E bKXg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Ro1Gjx+GXCli8+3u/nX1h8hOneAHRFQaTsJAIm1tRB3o/X4YmHCRzi+azX1x3yqJdaaiI6NlpuPTWwKXuk=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyHxfPWWtyT+Yz3VZLtBH8oXwTtf3WxH1kq1w0y8WYvIfMv1wrg TLUEpPp/pjnGkI/+HiWx1Qt5OAiFCIiTgR8X5eEujmwnx7AQfDBP0Y0/Ow4KzFglhYc= X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7cniEEjbry22P+BEY1YUMVcjFlbh6iAwBSb4+8wJQowVe9DRznbFibtX2veYm9u RQG8pzyzy4rkpBXpVcpzmSvV3gMZCMdE1Lt2LRuOkA1S4FcioXIPkmuuM85PkJplwWno43KEFrb QcC75PQdqX+TByjwur6yn9wxc5B8YZvzpJy+LuX4I0YxiyMiVQDT406LIkwGwpBilAS0Wg4qyw7 PjSGK+7guOW96bpwXT40Ph9uAhS4nV0YB5plIS3fYEERiW3k/PObi5G0WUrofpt1LLMYiJ/WPcn 7xmWa2Gt/q5gIOPePCBZ/Ey5kP/tXpCffU76gyqNHA1ySDTyNcU19z6y7LhsR9EIcvnSiKtj6xf 9mCC3xpzx4LU27/UR67Dm/OD6MCsdxTN1QWE5dQfSPW9NjQvm4NCAQkhVJoxiWwU5Cw2c1rkTfN gW2ByH7+yZNGk= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5d46:0:b0:51c:2554:a8f5 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-51c8b43a3c8mr125847521cf.36.1783696937888; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2603:7001:f100:500:365a:60ff:fe62:ff29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-51caae2068asm17426371cf.17.2026.07.10.08.22.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:22:13 -0400 From: Johannes Weiner To: Salvatore Dipietro Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, hch@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, dgc@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, alisaidi@amazon.com, blakgeof@amazon.com, abuehaze@amazon.com, dipietro.salvatore@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Brendan Jackman , Zi Yan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: avoid direct compaction for costly __GFP_NORETRY allocations Message-ID: References: <20260710143437.12379-1-dipiets@amazon.it> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260710143437.12379-1-dipiets@amazon.it> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 02:34:37PM +0000, Salvatore Dipietro wrote: > Commit 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace") > introduced high-order folio allocations in the iomap buffered write > path. When memory is fragmented, each failed costly-order allocation > enters __alloc_pages_slowpath() which runs direct compaction and > drain_all_pages(), causing a 0.45x throughput drop on PostgreSQL > pgbench (simple-update) with 1024 clients on a 96-vCPU arm64 system. > > The root issue is that direct compaction is too expensive for hot > allocation paths that have fallbacks to smaller allocations. > __filemap_get_folio_mpol() already marks higher-order allocations with > __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN, signalling that the caller can handle > failure. However, the page allocator still attempts full direct > compaction for costly orders with __GFP_NORETRY, which is unnecessarily > aggressive when the caller will simply retry at a lower order. > > For costly-order allocations with __GFP_NORETRY, skip direct compaction > but wake kcompactd on the preferred node so that background compaction > can defragment memory for future allocations, and return failure > immediately so the caller can fall back. > > This keeps compaction working for long-term system health while > removing it from the latency-critical direct allocation path. > > Test environment: > Hardware: AWS EC2 m8g.24xlarge (96 vCPU, arm64) > 12x 1TB IO2 32000 IOPS RAID0 XFS > OS: AL2023 > Kernel: next-20260707 > Database: PostgreSQL 18.4 > Workload: pgbench simple-update, 1024 clients, 96 threads, 1200s > > Results (average of 3 runs, TPS): > > Config Avg TPS % vs Baseline > baseline (no patch) 70,389.24 - > With this patch 154,977.02 +120.17% > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260403193535.9970-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#t [v1] > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260420161404.642-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v2] > Fixes: 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Salvatore Dipietro > --- > v3: Move to mm/page_alloc.c, wake kcompactd instead of avoiding it > v2: Move from fs/iomap/buffered-io.c to mm/filemap.c > v1: Avoid compaction in iomap folio allocation > > mm/page_alloc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index a63733dac659..2d02703d8f0f 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -4883,6 +4883,26 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, > /* If allocation has taken excessively long, warn about it */ > check_alloc_stall_warn(gfp_mask, ac->nodemask, order, alloc_start_time); > > + /* > + * Costly allocations with __GFP_NORETRY are opportunistic - Don't > + * stall on direct compaction or reclaim; instead, kick > + * kcompactd on the preferred node so large pages may become > + * available for future allocations and let the caller fall back now. > + * > + * Direct compaction is way too costly for hot allocation paths on > + * large systems: each attempt calls drain_all_pages() which IPIs > + * every CPU. Only wake kcompactd on the local node to avoid > + * cross-NUMA interference with unrelated workloads. > + */ > + if (costly_order && (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)) { I think that's reasonable. __GFP_NORETRY is a bad name, in practice it just means try not too hard. One direct attempt at say order-0 is fine; a direct attempt at order-8 is something entirely different. The callsites COULD judiciously use __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but I don't think we want to burden them with that. And as much as I hate that kind of arbitrary costly_order gating, having every caller make up its own rules would be even worse. > + struct zone *preferred_zone = ac->preferred_zoneref->zone; > + > + if (preferred_zone) > + wakeup_kcompactd(preferred_zone->zone_pgdat, order, > + ac->highest_zoneidx); Let's not do that, though. The page allocator doesn't wake kcompactd directly - it's subordinate to kswapd because it needs free pages to operate. The coordination code is in kswapd. And that's woken up further up the function. The problem is we're lying to it by passing __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM when in fact we categorically don't do that for this request. And we're lying to various other can_direct_reclaim and can_compact gates inside the slowpath itself. That's not good. My suggestion would be to clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM first thing in the slowpath function. Before that nofail branch. Before can_direct_reclaim and can_compact are set. So that everything in the function that checks these works properly. And then you'll get kswapd -> kcompactd wakes for that request. > + goto nopage; > + } > + > /* Try direct reclaim and then allocating */ > if (!compact_first) { > page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, > -- > 2.47.3