From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Carlos Llamas" <cmllamas@google.com>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] rust_binder: move (e)poll wait queue to Process
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 10:32:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alIbx8oav01VLarX@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alGOptAAFXuHscmG@tardis.local>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 05:30:30PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 10:43:13AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > + {
> > + let poll = loop {
> > + if let Some(poll) = this.poll.as_ref() {
> > + break poll;
> > + }
> > +
> > + let poll = PollCondVarBox::new(c"Process::poll", kernel::static_lock_class!())?;
> > + // Reuse our existing lock to synchronize callers initializing.
> > + let _guard = this.node_refs.lock();
> > + this.poll.populate(poll);
> > + };
>
> Note sure whether this lock is needed? SetOnce::populate() should be
> atomic, i.e. only one populate() would win?
>
> Also seems we should have a SetOnce::as_ref_or_populate(&self, default:
> T).
I'm taking this lock because I want to ensure that losers only loop
once. The problem is that just because you lost the race in populate(),
it's not guaranteed that as_ref() will return Some on the next
iteration, since the winner of the race may still be busy executing
populate(). Taking the loop avoids this possibility.
With regards to as_ref_or_populate(), I point you to this discussion for
reasons why this is hard:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/aZLZbN5C3wXgt3kL@google.com/
> The rest looks good to me. FWIW,
>
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Alice
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-11 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 10:43 [PATCH v6 0/2] Avoid synchronize_rcu() for every thread drop in Rust Binder Alice Ryhl
2026-07-07 10:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] rust: poll: use kfree_rcu() for PollCondVar Alice Ryhl
2026-07-10 14:23 ` Boqun Feng
2026-07-07 10:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] rust_binder: move (e)poll wait queue to Process Alice Ryhl
2026-07-11 0:30 ` Boqun Feng
2026-07-11 10:32 ` Alice Ryhl [this message]
2026-07-11 13:37 ` Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alIbx8oav01VLarX@google.com \
--to=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox