From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Cen Zhang <rollkingzzc@gmail.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] f2fs: protect gc task pointer during teardown
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:38:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alWhJCTUnPXkjryW@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB7XQsEuX4Ctbz2mSUb+qWpHVfN2Q6LcToxk2Yo6QQt+o01hbw@mail.gmail.com>
Could you please post the original patch again? Somehow I can't find it.
On 07/08, Cen Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a gentle ping on this patch.
>
> I would really appreciate any feedback when you have a chance.
>
> Best regards,
> Zhang Cen
>
> Zhang Cen <rollkingzzc@gmail.com> 于2026年6月30日周二 22:20写道:
> >
> > This patch is based on the preceding patch "f2fs: embed
> > f2fs_gc_kthread in f2fs_sb_info", which gives the GC waitqueues and
> > thread tunables superblock lifetime. With that container lifetime fixed,
> > f2fs_gc_task remains the running-state marker and the task_struct pointer
> > that needs separate lifetime protection.
> >
> > During shutdown, f2fs_stop_gc_thread() stops the GC task and wakes
> > GC_MERGE foreground waiters while f2fs_balance_fs() can concurrently
> > queue on gc_th->fggc_wq. The preceding embedded-gc_thread patch keeps
> > that waitqueue storage alive for the superblock lifetime; this patch
> > protects the remaining f2fs_gc_task pointer by publishing and detaching
> > it under gc_task_lock, and by making sysfs users that dereference the
> > task hold the same lock.
> >
> > The buggy scenario involves two paths, with each column showing the
> > order within that path:
> >
> > foreground f2fs_balance_fs() caller: shutdown path:
> > 1. observes no checkpoint error 1. sets CP_ERROR_FLAG
> > 2. snapshots sbi->gc_thread 2. enters f2fs_stop_gc_thread()
> > 3. queues on gc_th->fggc_wq 3. stops gc_th->f2fs_gc_task
> > 4. wakes gc_wait_queue_head 4. wakes gc_th->fggc_wq
> > 5. sleeps for foreground GC 5. frees gc_th in the old layout
> > 6. finish_wait() touches fggc_wq
> >
> > GC_MERGE does not keep independent work_struct items that shutdown can
> > cancel. Its pending foreground GC requests are waitqueue waiters. Drain
> > them by withdrawing the GC task pointer, stopping the task, waking
> > gc_th->fggc_wq, and leaving each waiter to remove its own wait entry
> > with finish_wait().
> >
> > Add gc_task_lock to struct f2fs_gc_kthread and use f2fs_update_gc_task()
> > to publish the GC task only after the new kthread has been created and
> > its nice value has been set. The start path uses kthread_create() so the
> > task is not woken until after f2fs_gc_task is visible to waiters. The
> > stop path updates f2fs_gc_task to NULL under the same lock before
> > kthread_stop(), so later readers see that no new foreground GC work
> > should be handed to the background thread.
> >
> > f2fs_balance_fs() also rechecks f2fs_gc_task after prepare_to_wait(). If
> > the GC task has already been withdrawn, the caller removes its wait entry
> > without waking the GC thread or sleeping for new foreground GC work. Thus
> > shutdown drains already queued waiters and stops accepting new foreground
> > GC work once the task pointer is withdrawn.
> >
> > Task pointer users are protected separately from the embedded container
> > lifetime. A sysfs critical_task_priority store now checks f2fs_gc_task
> > and calls set_user_nice() under gc_task_lock. Boolean running-state
> > checks that do not dereference the task_struct use READ_ONCE().
> >
> > One observed report was:
> >
> > BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in finish_wait+0x276/0x290
> > Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881150819b8 by task dd/802
> > The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888115081900 which
> > belongs to the cache kmalloc-256 of size 256
> > The buggy address is located 184 bytes inside of freed 256-byte region
> > Call trace:
> > finish_wait()
> > f2fs_balance_fs()
> > f2fs_write_single_data_page()
> > f2fs_write_cache_pages()
> > __f2fs_write_data_pages()
> > do_writepages()
> > filemap_fdatawrite_wbc()
> > __filemap_fdatawrite_range()
> > file_write_and_wait_range()
> > f2fs_do_sync_file()
> > f2fs_sync_file()
> > do_fsync()
> > Freed by task stack:
> > kfree()
> > f2fs_stop_gc_thread()
> > f2fs_do_shutdown()
> > f2fs_shutdown()
> > fs_bdev_mark_dead()
> >
> > Fixes: 5911d2d1d1a3 ("f2fs: introduce gc_merge mount option")
> > Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Cen <rollkingzzc@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Based on:
> > - [PATCH] f2fs: embed f2fs_gc_kthread in f2fs_sb_info
> >
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> > fs/f2fs/super.c | 5 +++--
> > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 15 +++++++++------
> > 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index 8011bbdf2c68..1aa8f8adddaa 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > #include <linux/cred.h>
> > #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > #include <linux/bio.h>
> > #include <linux/blkdev.h>
> > @@ -1750,6 +1751,7 @@ struct decompress_io_ctx {
> >
> > struct f2fs_gc_kthread {
> > struct task_struct *f2fs_gc_task;
> > + spinlock_t gc_task_lock; /* protects f2fs_gc_task */
> > wait_queue_head_t gc_wait_queue_head;
> >
> > /* for gc sleep time */
> > @@ -1775,6 +1777,19 @@ struct f2fs_gc_kthread {
> > unsigned int boost_gc_greedy;
> > };
> >
> > +static inline struct task_struct *
> > +f2fs_update_gc_task(struct f2fs_gc_kthread *gc_th, struct task_struct *task)
> > +{
> > + struct task_struct *old_task;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&gc_th->gc_task_lock);
> > + old_task = READ_ONCE(gc_th->f2fs_gc_task);
> > + WRITE_ONCE(gc_th->f2fs_gc_task, task);
> > + spin_unlock(&gc_th->gc_task_lock);
> > +
> > + return old_task;
> > +}
> > +
> > struct f2fs_sb_info {
> > struct super_block *sb; /* pointer to VFS super block */
> > struct proc_dir_entry *s_proc; /* proc entry */
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > index e8244b92d8ce..7253a920153b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data)
> > int f2fs_start_gc_thread(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > {
> > struct f2fs_gc_kthread *gc_th = &sbi->gc_thread;
> > + struct task_struct *task;
> > dev_t dev = sbi->sb->s_bdev->bd_dev;
> >
> > gc_th->urgent_sleep_time = DEF_GC_THREAD_URGENT_SLEEP_TIME;
> > @@ -219,26 +220,29 @@ int f2fs_start_gc_thread(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >
> > init_waitqueue_head(&gc_th->gc_wait_queue_head);
> > init_waitqueue_head(&gc_th->fggc_wq);
> > - gc_th->f2fs_gc_task = kthread_run(gc_thread_func, sbi,
> > - "f2fs_gc-%u:%u", MAJOR(dev), MINOR(dev));
> > - if (IS_ERR(gc_th->f2fs_gc_task)) {
> > - int err = PTR_ERR(gc_th->f2fs_gc_task);
> > + task = kthread_create(gc_thread_func, sbi, "f2fs_gc-%u:%u",
> > + MAJOR(dev), MINOR(dev));
> > + if (IS_ERR(task)) {
> > + int err = PTR_ERR(task);
> >
> > - gc_th->f2fs_gc_task = NULL;
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - set_user_nice(gc_th->f2fs_gc_task,
> > - PRIO_TO_NICE(sbi->critical_task_priority));
> > + set_user_nice(task, PRIO_TO_NICE(sbi->critical_task_priority));
> > + f2fs_update_gc_task(gc_th, task);
> > + wake_up_process(task);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > void f2fs_stop_gc_thread(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > {
> > struct f2fs_gc_kthread *gc_th = &sbi->gc_thread;
> > + struct task_struct *task;
> >
> > - kthread_stop(gc_th->f2fs_gc_task);
> > - gc_th->f2fs_gc_task = NULL;
> > + task = f2fs_update_gc_task(gc_th, NULL);
> > + if (!task)
> > + return;
> > + kthread_stop(task);
> > wake_up_all(&gc_th->fggc_wq);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 0b706568b034..e6e67c233e27 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -425,6 +425,8 @@ int f2fs_commit_atomic_write(struct inode *inode)
> > */
> > void f2fs_balance_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool need)
> > {
> > + struct f2fs_gc_kthread *gc_th = &sbi->gc_thread;
> > +
> > if (f2fs_cp_error(sbi))
> > return;
> >
> > @@ -452,14 +454,16 @@ void f2fs_balance_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool need)
> > f2fs_submit_merged_write(sbi, DATA);
> > f2fs_submit_all_merged_ipu_writes(sbi);
> >
> > - if (test_opt(sbi, GC_MERGE) && sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task) {
> > + if (test_opt(sbi, GC_MERGE) && READ_ONCE(gc_th->f2fs_gc_task)) {
> > DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> >
> > - prepare_to_wait(&sbi->gc_thread.fggc_wq, &wait,
> > - TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > - wake_up(&sbi->gc_thread.gc_wait_queue_head);
> > - io_schedule();
> > - finish_wait(&sbi->gc_thread.fggc_wq, &wait);
> > + prepare_to_wait(&gc_th->fggc_wq, &wait,
> > + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > + if (READ_ONCE(gc_th->f2fs_gc_task)) {
> > + wake_up(&gc_th->gc_wait_queue_head);
> > + io_schedule();
> > + }
> > + finish_wait(&gc_th->fggc_wq, &wait);
> > } else {
> > struct f2fs_gc_control gc_control = {
> > .victim_segno = NULL_SEGNO,
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index e9ecd67a3f3b..140fffe93ea4 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -2943,11 +2943,11 @@ static int __f2fs_remount(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
> > if ((flags & SB_RDONLY) ||
> > (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).bggc_mode == BGGC_MODE_OFF &&
> > !test_opt(sbi, GC_MERGE))) {
> > - if (sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task) {
> > + if (READ_ONCE(sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task)) {
> > f2fs_stop_gc_thread(sbi);
> > need_restart_gc = true;
> > }
> > - } else if (!sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task) {
> > + } else if (!READ_ONCE(sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task)) {
> > err = f2fs_start_gc_thread(sbi);
> > if (err)
> > goto restore_opts;
> > @@ -5051,6 +5051,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> > spin_lock_init(&sbi->inode_lock[i]);
> > }
> > mutex_init(&sbi->flush_lock);
> > + spin_lock_init(&sbi->gc_thread.gc_task_lock);
> >
> > /* set a block size */
> > if (unlikely(!sb_set_blocksize(sb, F2FS_BLKSIZE))) {
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > index be92c05a5420..c83cd1d3ede2 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> > @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> > sbi->gc_mode = GC_NORMAL;
> > } else if (t == 1) {
> > sbi->gc_mode = GC_URGENT_HIGH;
> > - if (sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task) {
> > + if (READ_ONCE(sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task)) {
> > sbi->gc_thread.gc_wake = true;
> > wake_up_interruptible_all(
> > &sbi->gc_thread.gc_wait_queue_head);
> > @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> > sbi->gc_mode = GC_URGENT_LOW;
> > } else if (t == 3) {
> > sbi->gc_mode = GC_URGENT_MID;
> > - if (sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task) {
> > + if (READ_ONCE(sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task)) {
> > sbi->gc_thread.gc_wake = true;
> > wake_up_interruptible_all(
> > &sbi->gc_thread.gc_wait_queue_head);
> > @@ -981,17 +981,20 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
> > }
> >
> > if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "critical_task_priority")) {
> > + int nice;
> > +
> > if (t < NICE_TO_PRIO(MIN_NICE) || t > NICE_TO_PRIO(MAX_NICE))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
> > return -EPERM;
> > sbi->critical_task_priority = t;
> > + nice = PRIO_TO_NICE(sbi->critical_task_priority);
> > if (sbi->cprc_info.f2fs_issue_ckpt)
> > - set_user_nice(sbi->cprc_info.f2fs_issue_ckpt,
> > - PRIO_TO_NICE(sbi->critical_task_priority));
> > + set_user_nice(sbi->cprc_info.f2fs_issue_ckpt, nice);
> > + spin_lock(&sbi->gc_thread.gc_task_lock);
> > if (sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task)
> > - set_user_nice(sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task,
> > - PRIO_TO_NICE(sbi->critical_task_priority));
> > + set_user_nice(sbi->gc_thread.f2fs_gc_task, nice);
> > + spin_unlock(&sbi->gc_thread.gc_task_lock);
> > return count;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 14:20 [PATCH v7] f2fs: protect gc task pointer during teardown Zhang Cen
2026-07-08 3:21 ` Cen Zhang
2026-07-14 2:38 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2026-07-14 3:55 ` Cen Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alWhJCTUnPXkjryW@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rollkingzzc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox