From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com (mail-ed1-f49.google.com [209.85.208.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CACB541CB23 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784106999; cv=none; b=PBlBMwv5pnfkEFgPL7pZ6S2A129ZBga7pVicyye8X39JUdOX7MRjwAOZQQfx0iYBN0cjF1x/3zVqfVHbGTTA8D6zyrnKjIMWrFwz10S+Sjsj9IGcP6FoGbd2VIrZp3NcsmtkO0fFeRUr5GchkDpu9i4+tDtJ9BfnXR9I4BqmgFk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784106999; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j9GQJQzKvcMR+VCSiLR4VIzU/cQ+59f4K6xs5L/YzoM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KEUvnymmoSgRKepqf1Npic25Ul9uv/ampscpMNh48aO6JRBGP87El5L4xnoNJZi6dKSd/HqLkP3dEQ148RfJG0KvUA1lj9fPa8PfPWyAeAcDn1SESacxY8NPVTe37ua7dtO5k1E35P7W8+oBaVpD41EX66D0M1lc3dpimxD7lOA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=eyJ0F88i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="eyJ0F88i" Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-698562f10e7so7414101a12.0 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 02:16:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1784106994; x=1784711794; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=A1ZmhCboRG80lxcYaF433cPODXSJBxTB3W4f2Wh3+4c=; b=eyJ0F88ipHm7mrBSfZk5sbVGtLSJL61gfqM4lmBMfcwfbHgCK+2o0CQumTSsH7jCG2 MhIAXtEF1t6+E0MGfjVdNOBIoSjqjqBbr3p7ZngEHg6h01XrhWlXLlvtypxmKnOdJaDm FUDgM08QDUiGzMuSgsg1Rh6vjTpFRmlfzmsyKSXA3mM9skH1ytlWXREnI5pX2KJ1xK2A baSMJRgxUenAH1cqQF+ltlf1m25ideXr1y6U2GwDutvv/u5Z3aUvEPxBkXL1W8qr4zCd yYNbqLuaFYOPLSd2r9hHyzp0c3NvIeiW8pZUpDN0saakUlW+FNHUC7QVVNGf/Xi0CoP2 OtGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1784106994; x=1784711794; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to:content-type; bh=A1ZmhCboRG80lxcYaF433cPODXSJBxTB3W4f2Wh3+4c=; b=Dv5/u053mZR/trT4niGLPsWbX2XfblhQvWAnys1/DYohL917g0q4di+GGF2pU9OtuN 3wuTj+bprBt9oAXZ/EesIfvsFoNiW3sQ6beIttN+qszTVP0nXhN0OYqLf34ZbPfAImXZ SX9AHwC+K2k7Q9L4oxf2Nq+aGSmw+P+OK+fC6RLcf/MqugcRphEl51/ufUG9S7Bk63LC V5K8zMYbSmtwvbk58ImOYYDxS4UztwHQJJPusQYbhvqz8AvlM0DLwna6sNWO6naWp3N8 rOPVPrzWrT1vbSntynRs+shL+Vj++jC/VfjYU6YN63EMAIzSRTrOYL+bXpLWiA7ftnKr MQuQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Ro0Xyecqihhf/1FNB4TAU282t+1jjG1phYAmulfaq8rWdU2Ugzg8V36RZrdx76GuqvJf4cOAVxmyBt21H8=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzH0t83ZEZtfMrByH8IBdewym4l+cNmIIwAsTBOoructGxLAZq9 AvHE2i5hXSnZ5zn1HP3hT8sHKNYNN+e3w4a4gh7YhMG1hKGl+u8+qI/Gkdet41C24HQ= X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7ck3k0K24cHE8HVFZa6qpL82hgmQ88HgCiEc72pPrfNCebMTUMp67QkvJEALDwL lSURqYZqEvCs3XagMPL8tyv8QVdzI23yjbpESxJyzv/+0SXSwGQOzpfEmbvVITLYryYJDldFtle Ybq0/mwopI6ACwcDI0I8/NrGH+Szqy0ZvkbD0YnTbQHAaUferfa7yAIUhwPEIaFl7zZFJ7MVqYt hlOV2JF7E9KrmgWz2SMYS/5soaDMmgSg7gSWIM9h61lkJJFkzWkQWGyvEy8Za7c9AAA9o6YgLVn rrcf+OwyfLmp6RWaDxd4m8EKq+KvzlVqSw8q0Cc7+14sfA0a1pRfg+4/AXZ6nQr2XH9YwyWceec /4joF861U4VrdSinZXiJxCuF4K1pkMofWligVh7bdymcbM0Q6TjVaUYtO0pM6mDsveL/knjpiwX zlcMiVgObG9cU/ltyOmW/hVmRvMsxtmggE X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9c8d:b0:c16:579f:f7e2 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c1667c58e81mr324023266b.64.1784106994203; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 02:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from u94a (27-51-89-168.adsl.fetnet.net. [27.51.89.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2ccc9d3c99fsm130888425ad.68.2026.07.15.02.16.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Jul 2026 02:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:16:17 +0800 From: Shung-Hsi Yu To: Eduard Zingerman Cc: sun jian , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , Emil Tsalapatis , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Martin KaFai Lau , Shuah Khan , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Matt Mullins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover negative buffer pointer offsets Message-ID: References: <20260714093846.18159-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com> <20260714093846.18159-3-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com> <488c235db713648bb2f5c90e4389c96a97ebcdde.camel@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <488c235db713648bb2f5c90e4389c96a97ebcdde.camel@gmail.com> On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 01:54:37AM -0700, Eduard Zingerman wrote: > On Wed, 2026-07-15 at 13:26 +0800, sun jian wrote: > > > Anyway, still recommend adding a regression test that test access to one > > > byte before the start of writable context. > > > > The new tracepoint_writable_reject_negative_const_offset verifier case > > already covers an access before the start of the writable context: > > > >     r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0); > >     r6 += -8; > >     r0 = *(u64 *)(r6 + 0); > > > > Its effective access range is [-8, 0), so it is rejected at load time. > > This is the direct regression test for the negative-start case. > > The existing test seem to be sufficient, why would it matter is at > offset -8 or -1 given that the read is appropriately sized? Right it doesn't. Let's just, pretend I haven't suggest that. [...]