From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>,
Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
Naveen Kumar Chaudhary <naveen.osdev@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] printk: Handle pre-enabled consoles in the top-level register_console()
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:43:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alecraCbhh_W4ZtF@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87qzl5bsqu.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
On Tue 2026-07-14 15:39:45, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2026-06-04, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> > The function try_enable_preferred_console() currently has the
> > non-obvious side effect of returning success for consoles that are
> > already pre-enabled. This obscures the logic flow during console
> > registration.
> >
> > Move the check for pre-enabled consoles directly into the top-level
> > register_console(). This change makes the handling of pre-enabled
> > consoles explicit and easier to follow.
> >
> > Furthermore, this separation lays the groundwork for future cleanups
> > where try_enable_preferred_console() can be restricted to cases where
> > an entry actually exists in the console_cmdline[] array.
> >
> > Also it fixes a possible out-of-bound access when the console_cmdline[]
> > array is full and no console matched. In fact, the check of
> > c->user_specified did not make much sense. The new console either
> > matched and was handled in the for-cycle. Or it did not match
> > and then *c pointed to an unused entry.
> >
> > Possible behavior change:
> >
> > try_enable_preferred_console() will newly be called also with
> > @user_specified parameter set to "false" when it failed with the "true"
> > variant. But it looks like the right way to do. It will allow to call
> > newcon->setup() when the console was preferred by some platform
> > specific code.
>
> I agree that it is the right way to do it. But I am a bit confused about
> the pre-enabled consoles.
You are not alone ;-)
> I understood it that a driver manually sets CON_ENABLED because that
> console is not enabled via normal methods ("console=" or "stdout" in
> device-tree). There are several examples of this (netconsole, pstore,
> nfcon, kgdb).
My understanding is that these set CON_ENABLED because they
are enabled another way, e.g. netconsole=, ramoops, ...
And console_cmdline was originally only for consoles defined
via the console= parameter, ... And it probably does not make
sense to add a fake entry into console_cmdline[] array just
to make sure that the console driver would match something.
> - drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c
> - drivers/tty/serial/ma35d1_serial.c
> - drivers/tty/serial/mux.c
My expectation is that these are some special platforms where the
authors just wanted them enabled out-of-box.
BTW, similar situation is also in handling SPCR on different
architectures. I have investigated it some time ago and found
the following. The console proposed by SPCR is:
+ ignored on "loongarch" architecture.
+ requested on "x86" when "acpi=spcr" is defined on the command line,
otherwise ignored.
+ requested on "arm" architecture unless "acpi=nospcr" is defined on
the command line.
+ requested on "riscv" architecture unless acpi is disabled
So, again, some architectures get a particular console preferred
by the particular HW by default. Others get the kernel default
which is typically a graphical ttyX.
> that are also setting CON_ENABLED, but seem that they should be
> specified in the normal way.
>
> Are these drivers falsely setting CON_ENABLED? Is there a clear
> description about when a driver should manually set CON_ENABLED?
I think that it is intentional. And Marcos is working on some
clean up to remove the hack with CON_ENABLED completely, see
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251227-printk-cleanup-part3-v1-0-21a291bcf197@suse.com/
> > Reported-by: Naveen Kumar Chaudhary <naveen.osdev@gmail.com> # out-of-bound access
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7sq4tr2nmlz32tvkf6vpsghv6exvqfghsrlvywjcqihzsqqbf7@bspclmti5xg4
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
>
> Despite my open questions about CON_ENABLED, this patch is simplifying
> the pre-enabled path and correctly specifying the possible behavior
> change.
>
> Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Thanks for review.
I am going to queue this patch for 7.3. I prevents a rather
theoretical out-of-bound access to console_cmdline array,
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 10:14 [PATCH v4 00/11] printk: Clean up preferred console handling Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] printk: Handle pre-enabled consoles in the top-level register_console() Petr Mladek
2026-07-14 13:33 ` John Ogness
2026-07-15 14:43 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] printk: Rename struct console_cmdline to preferred_console Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] printk: Rename preferred_console to preferred_dev_console Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] printk: Separate code for adding/updating preferred console metadata Petr Mladek
2026-07-14 14:35 ` John Ogness
2026-07-15 15:52 ` Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] printk: Cleanup _braille_(un)register_console() wrappers Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] console/braille: Lock console->setup() call during the registration Petr Mladek
2026-07-15 14:41 ` John Ogness
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] printk: Separate code for enabling console Petr Mladek
2026-07-15 16:01 ` John Ogness
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] printk: Try to register each console as Braille first Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] printk: Do not set Braille console as preferred_console Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] printk: Modify try_enable_default_console() to return error/success Petr Mladek
2026-06-04 10:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] printk: Try enable preferred consoles only when there are any Petr Mladek
2026-07-14 8:42 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] printk: Clean up preferred console handling Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alecraCbhh_W4ZtF@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpdesouza@suse.com \
--cc=naveen.osdev@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox