From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753480AbaCGRFx (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:05:53 -0500 Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.80]:50687 "EHLO qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753406AbaCGRFv (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:05:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:05:49 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@nuc To: Andrew Morton cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree In-Reply-To: <20140306173822.1f4fed3a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20140306192234.62ad3ac104a2adc16752b033@canb.auug.org.au> <20140306134848.7aabdc426fbad30f6e818631@linux-foundation.org> <20140307115744.5c3d5475af77726dc6c5a76b@canb.auug.org.au> <20140306173822.1f4fed3a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Andrew Morton wrote: > > So, by "the whole series" do you mean just/all these: > > > > percpu-add-raw_cpu_ops.patch > > ... > > sh-replace-__get_cpu_var-uses.patch > > Yep. Commented out in http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/series > > > If so, I will remove them from my tree today (if you don't get around to > > a new mmotm before then). > > Cool. I need at least the initial 5 patches that establish the framework in -next and do the debugging in order to make further progress on this one. The rest are bits and pieces that may require some detail work.