From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933554AbbI1MnD (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:43:03 -0400
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:44355 "EHLO
	mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932692AbbI1MnA (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:43:00 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,602,1437429600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="179752057"
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:42:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v2] coccinelle: assign signed result to unsigned
 variable
In-Reply-To: <560930A7.2070400@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1509281440320.3108@hadrien>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1509261106040.2737@hadrien> <1443437687-16559-1-git-send-email-a.hajda@samsung.com> <56092D7B.4030106@users.sourceforge.net> <56092E98.9000103@samsung.com> <560930A7.2070400@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> >> How do you think about the reuse of the parameter "--recursive-includes" here?
> >
> > Last time I have tried it, kernel source check took more than 10 hours,
> > so I gave up.
>
> This is interesting background information.
>
> There are opportunities for more fine-tuning of such a source code analysis,
> aren't there?

I guess parallelism would be helpful?  You could try the following
options:

-j n --chunksize 10 --recursive-includes --include-headers-for-types

where n is the number of cores that you want to use.  Parsed header files
will be cached within chunks.  I don't really know what is the best
chunksize.

julia


>
> Regards,
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> Cocci mailing list
> Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
>